AIVC vs. GOOX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AIVC (Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF) and GOOX (T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIVC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index, while GOOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. AIVC is passively managed, while GOOX is actively managed. Over the past year, AIVC returned 96.84% vs 213.88% for GOOX. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AIVC charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for GOOX.

Performance

AIVC vs. GOOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVC achieves a 56.92% return, which is significantly higher than GOOX's 24.05% return.

AIVC

• 1D: 3.37%
• 1M: 0.06%
• 6M: 47.24%
• YTD: 56.92%
• 1Y: 96.84%
• 3Y*: 42.42%
• 5Y*: 15.82%
• 10Y*: 15.10%
• ALL TIME*: 15.34%

GOOX

• 1D: 8.51%
• 1M: 6.14%
• 6M: 3.76%
• YTD: 24.05%
• 1Y: 213.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 71.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	$721.94K	$1.14M	$2.79M
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF	$9.21M	$7.02M	$7.62M

AIVC vs. GOOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	56.92%	39.94%	21.02%
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF	24.05%	121.41%	44.31%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVC and GOOX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.45

Return for Risk

AIVC vs. GOOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIVC

AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 90
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 87
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 90

GOOX

GOOX Risk / Return Rank: 93
GOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIVC vs. GOOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIVC	GOOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.77	3.36	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.74	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.46	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.18	5.52	-1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.70	14.22	+0.47

AIVC vs. GOOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVC Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the GOOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVC and GOOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AIVC vs. GOOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVC drawdown since its inception was -56.11%, which is greater than GOOX's maximum drawdown of -52.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVC and GOOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIVC	GOOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.11%	-52.46%	-3.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.29%	-39.00%	+15.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.72%	-17.55%	+3.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.35%	-17.47%	+1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.61%	15.11%	-8.50%

Volatility

AIVC vs. GOOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) is 13.60%, while T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) has a volatility of 27.63%. This indicates that AIVC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIVC	GOOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.60%	27.63%	-14.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.91%	49.57%	-19.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.27%	64.16%	-28.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.40%	61.98%	-30.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.52%	61.98%	-34.46%

AIVC vs. GOOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIVC vs. GOOX - Dividend Comparison

AIVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than GOOX's 0.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	0.11%	0.17%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.39%	1.16%	0.38%	0.92%	0.64%
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF	0.25%	0.30%	16.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIVC and GOOX in my portfolio?

AIVC and GOOX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIVC or GOOX?

GOOX has higher volatility (27.63%) compared to AIVC (13.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVC dropped -56.11% vs GOOX's -52.46%.

Which ETF is better, AIVC or GOOX?

On 1-year performance, GOOX leads with 213.88% vs 96.84% for AIVC. On fees, AIVC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, AIVC has been the lower-risk option at 13.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIVC or GOOX?

Over the 1-year period, GOOX has performed better with a 213.88% return vs 96.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIVC or GOOX?

AIVC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GOOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIVC or GOOX?

GOOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.11% for AIVC.

What is the main difference between AIVC and GOOX?

AIVC is categorized as Technology Equities, while GOOX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for AIVC and 1.05% for GOOX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.