AIS vs. SIOO
AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) and SIOO (VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by VistaShares, while SIOO is a Derivative Income fund tracking the S&P 100. AIS is actively managed, while SIOO is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SIOO.
Performance
AIS vs. SIOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIS achieves a 117.05% return, which is significantly higher than SIOO's 6.39% return.
AIS
- 1D
- 4.29%
- 1M
- 34.88%
- YTD
- 117.05%
- 6M
- 121.69%
- 1Y
- 230.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIOO
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 6.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIS vs. SIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF | 117.05% | -1.44% |
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF | 6.39% | 0.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIS and SIOO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIS vs. SIOO — Risk / Return Rank
AIS
SIOO
AIS vs. SIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIS | SIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 6.44 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.83 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.04 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 49.62 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIS | SIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.22 | 1.56 | +1.66 |
Drawdowns
AIS vs. SIOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than SIOO's maximum drawdown of -6.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and SIOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIS | SIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -6.86% | -25.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.38% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -1.02% | -4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | — | — |
Volatility
AIS vs. SIOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIS | SIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.06% | 10.40% | +25.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.09% | 10.40% | +27.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.09% | 10.40% | +27.69% |
AIS vs. SIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SIOO's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIS vs. SIOO - Dividend Comparison
AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF | 7.43% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIS and SIOO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SIOO is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SIOO is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.
SIOO has the higher dividend yield at 7.43%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.
AIS is categorized as Technology Equities, while SIOO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIS and 0.59% for SIOO.
Find the right allocation for AIS and SIOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer