SIOO vs. OMAH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH).

SIOO and OMAH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIOO is a passively managed fund by VistaShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 100. It was launched on Dec 10, 2025. OMAH is an actively managed fund by VistaShares. It was launched on Mar 4, 2025.

Performance

SIOO vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SIOO vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF	-3.21%	0.77%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	-0.14%	-0.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIOO achieves a -3.21% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's -0.14% return.

SIOO

• 1D: 3.21%
• 1M: -2.47%
• YTD: -3.21%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: -0.14%
• 6M: 0.87%
• 1Y: 6.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIOO vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIOO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

OMAH

VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF

SIOO

VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF

Return for Risk

SIOO vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 30
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 30
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIOO vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIOO	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.71	0.44	-1.15

Correlation

The correlation between SIOO and OMAH is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SIOO vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

SIOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, less than OMAH's 15.81% yield.

	TTM	2025
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF	5.30%	1.27%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.81%	12.86%

Drawdowns

SIOO vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIOO drawdown since its inception was -6.86%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIOO and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIOO	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.86%	-11.83%	+4.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.87%	-1.71%	-2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.33%	-1.39%	+0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SIOO	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.91%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.31%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.51%	13.94%	-2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.51%	14.00%	-2.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.51%	14.00%	-2.49%