SIOO vs. OMAH
SIOO (VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from VistaShares. SIOO is passively managed, while OMAH is actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIOO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.
Performance
SIOO vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIOO achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 4.56% return.
SIOO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 6.19%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 4.56%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 11.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIOO vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF | 6.19% | 0.77% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 4.56% | -0.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIOO and OMAH is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIOO vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
SIOO
OMAH
SIOO vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIOO | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.51 | 0.70 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
SIOO vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIOO drawdown since its inception was -6.86%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIOO and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIOO | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -11.83% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -2.65% | +2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.02% | -1.26% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.21% | — |
Volatility
SIOO vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIOO | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.36% | 8.05% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 13.21% | -2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 13.21% | -2.85% |
SIOO vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIOO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIOO vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
SIOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%, less than OMAH's 15.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.44% | 12.86% |
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF | 7.44% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIOO and OMAH have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SIOO is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SIOO is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.
OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 7.44% for SIOO.
Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SIOO and 0.95% for OMAH.
Find the right allocation for SIOO and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer