AIS vs. KOID

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) and KOID (KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. AIS is actively managed, while KOID is passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KOID.

Performance

AIS vs. KOID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIS achieves a 118.61% return, which is significantly higher than KOID's 34.14% return.

AIS

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 35.87%
• YTD: 118.61%
• 6M: 122.65%
• 1Y: 226.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KOID

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 14.72%
• YTD: 34.14%
• 6M: 42.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIS vs. KOID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	118.61%	47.28%
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF	34.14%	26.94%

Correlation

The correlation between AIS and KOID is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025	0.74

AIS vs. KOID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIS	KOID
Technology	84.6%	42.8%
Industrials	8.9%	35.5%
Utilities	3.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	5.8%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	15.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Financial Services	-0.0%	-

Return for Risk

AIS vs. KOID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 97
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIS vs. KOID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIS	KOID	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	6.34	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.78	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.80	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.41	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	47.43	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIS	KOID	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.24	2.91	+0.33

Drawdowns

AIS vs. KOID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than KOID's maximum drawdown of -18.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and KOID.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIS	KOID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.78%	-18.19%	-14.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.25%	+1.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-3.35%	-2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.80%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIS	KOID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.95%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.00%	24.55%	+11.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.04%	24.55%	+13.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.04%	24.55%	+13.49%

AIS vs. KOID - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than KOID's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIS vs. KOID - Dividend Comparison

AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KOID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.

Position	TTM	2025
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF	0.63%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIS and KOID in my portfolio?

AIS and KOID have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIS or KOID?

On fees, KOID is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIS or KOID?

KOID is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIS or KOID?

KOID has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

What is the main difference between AIS and KOID?

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIS and 0.69% for KOID.