AIS vs. IGPT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) and IGPT (Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. AIS is actively managed, while IGPT is passively managed. Over the past year, AIS returned 119.85% vs 74.93% for IGPT. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. AIS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IGPT.

Performance

AIS vs. IGPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIS achieves a 68.71% return, which is significantly higher than IGPT's 45.80% return.

AIS

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -14.16%
• 6M: 49.61%
• YTD: 68.71%
• 1Y: 119.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 75.75%

IGPT

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -8.98%
• 6M: 33.98%
• YTD: 45.80%
• 1Y: 74.93%
• 3Y*: 33.09%
• 5Y*: 12.06%
• 10Y*: 19.74%
• ALL TIME*: 14.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	$37.93M	$45.10M	$51.04M
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF	$28.12M	$21.89M	$21.69M

AIS vs. IGPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	68.71%	58.35%	-4.74%
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF	45.80%	31.55%	-5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between AIS and IGPT is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024	0.93

The correlation between AIS and IGPT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIS vs. IGPT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIS	IGPT
Technology	87.2%	76.6%
Industrials	6.8%	2.0%
Utilities	2.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	16.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.1%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	2.1%
Real Estate	-	2.4%
Financial Services	-0.0%	0.1%

Return for Risk

AIS vs. IGPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 87
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

IGPT

IGPT Risk / Return Rank: 80
IGPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
IGPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
IGPT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
IGPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
IGPT Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIS vs. IGPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIS	IGPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	1.94	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	2.46	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.32	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	2.89	+0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.91	11.04	+2.87

AIS vs. IGPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIS Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the IGPT Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIS and IGPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AIS vs. IGPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -34.44%, smaller than the maximum IGPT drawdown of -50.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and IGPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIS	IGPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.44%	-50.14%	+15.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.44%	-24.74%	-9.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.04%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.93%	-19.79%	-8.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.30%	-11.95%	+5.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.28%	6.47%	+1.81%

Volatility

AIS vs. IGPT - Volatility Comparison

VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a higher volatility of 21.48% compared to Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) at 14.66%. This indicates that AIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIS	IGPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.48%	14.66%	+6.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.19%	32.84%	+10.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.78%	36.85%	+10.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.01%	29.53%	+14.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.01%	27.29%	+16.72%

AIS vs. IGPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IGPT's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIS vs. IGPT - Dividend Comparison

AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF	0.01%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	1.41%	6.21%	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIS and IGPT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, AIS and IGPT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AIS or IGPT?

AIS has higher volatility (21.48%) compared to IGPT (14.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIS dropped -34.44% vs IGPT's -50.14%.

Which ETF is better, AIS or IGPT?

On 1-year performance, AIS leads with 119.85% vs 74.93% for IGPT. On fees, IGPT is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, IGPT has been the lower-risk option at 14.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIS or IGPT?

Over the 1-year period, AIS has performed better with a 119.85% return vs 74.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIS or IGPT?

IGPT is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIS or IGPT?

IGPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

What is the main difference between AIS and IGPT?

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIS and 0.56% for IGPT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.