PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIS vs. IDGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AIS vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AIS vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIS achieves a 14.59% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 17.03% return.


AIS

1D
3.27%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
14.59%
6M
20.26%
1Y
99.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IDGT

1D
1.53%
1M
1.01%
YTD
17.03%
6M
14.68%
1Y
34.93%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
11.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AIS vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AIS vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIS
AIS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

IDGT
IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIS vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AISIDGTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.73

1.63

+1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.20

2.20

+0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.30

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.38

2.94

+2.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.48

11.26

+7.22

AIS vs. IDGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIS Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIS and IDGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AISIDGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

1.63

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

0.15

+1.28

Correlation

The correlation between AIS and IDGT is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AIS vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIS
VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
0.95%1.17%1.64%0.37%0.30%0.28%0.60%0.42%0.65%0.57%0.75%0.72%

Drawdowns

AIS vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and IDGT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AISIDGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-77.95%

+45.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.75%

-12.23%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.84%

-1.06%

-6.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-20.04%

+14.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.46%

3.20%

+2.26%

Volatility

AIS vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a higher volatility of 15.36% compared to iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) at 8.17%. This indicates that AIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AISIDGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.36%

8.17%

+7.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.11%

15.15%

+11.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.65%

21.60%

+15.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.16%

23.03%

+13.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.16%

23.14%

+13.02%