AIS vs. BTYB
AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) and BTYB (VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by VistaShares, while BTYB is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for BTYB.
Performance
AIS vs. BTYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AIS
- 1D
- 4.29%
- 1M
- 34.88%
- YTD
- 117.05%
- 6M
- 121.69%
- 1Y
- 230.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTYB
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -2.69%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIS vs. BTYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF | 89.55% |
BTYB VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF | -1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIS and BTYB is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIS vs. BTYB — Risk / Return Rank
AIS
BTYB
AIS vs. BTYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF (BTYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIS | BTYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 6.44 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.83 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.04 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 49.62 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIS | BTYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.22 | -0.62 | +3.84 |
Drawdowns
AIS vs. BTYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than BTYB's maximum drawdown of -3.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and BTYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIS | BTYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -3.42% | -29.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.42% | +3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -0.94% | -4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | — | — |
Volatility
AIS vs. BTYB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIS | BTYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.06% | 8.70% | +27.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.09% | 8.70% | +29.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.09% | 8.70% | +29.39% |
AIS vs. BTYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BTYB's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIS vs. BTYB - Dividend Comparison
AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF | 0.00% |
BTYB VistaShares BitBonds 5 Yr Enhanced Weekly Distribution ETF | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIS and BTYB have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTYB is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTYB is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.
BTYB has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.
AIS is categorized as Technology Equities, while BTYB is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIS and 0.52% for BTYB.
Find the right allocation for AIS and BTYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer