PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIRR vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIRR vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIRR achieves a 31.74% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 47.28% return. Over the past 10 years, AIRR has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 22.05%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 44.55% annualized return.


AIRR

1D
0.83%
1M
1.32%
YTD
31.74%
6M
28.77%
1Y
67.12%
3Y*
35.29%
5Y*
25.46%
10Y*
22.05%

TQQQ

1D
1.99%
1M
2.89%
YTD
47.28%
6M
47.23%
1Y
114.36%
3Y*
59.79%
5Y*
24.34%
10Y*
44.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIRR vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
31.74%27.92%33.45%31.43%-2.08%33.01%17.17%33.97%-20.57%16.28%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
47.28%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between AIRR and TQQQ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2014

0.57

The correlation between AIRR and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIRR vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIRR
TQQQ

Industrials

92.4%
2.8%

Financial Services

6.9%
0.2%

Energy

3.8%
0.6%

Technology

0.7%
53.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Industrials

AIRR
92.4%
TQQQ
2.8%

Financial Services

AIRR
6.9%
TQQQ
0.2%

Energy

AIRR
3.8%
TQQQ
0.6%

Technology

AIRR
0.7%
TQQQ
53.8%

Basic Materials

AIRR

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

AIRR

-

TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

AIRR

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

AIRR

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Healthcare

AIRR

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

AIRR

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Utilities

AIRR

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIRR vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIRR vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIRRTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.32

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

2.89

+2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.33

9.26

+9.07

AIRR vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIRR and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIRR vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIRR drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIRR and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIRRTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.37%

-81.66%

+39.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.09%

-36.97%

+23.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.95%

-58.04%

+30.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.95%

-81.66%

+53.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.37%

-81.66%

+39.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-11.12%

+9.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-18.51%

+11.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

11.52%

-7.95%

Volatility

AIRR vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) is 9.32%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 22.79%. This indicates that AIRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIRRTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.32%

22.79%

-13.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.81%

41.26%

-20.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.19%

51.24%

-25.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.45%

67.02%

-41.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.36%

66.22%

-39.86%

AIRR vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIRR has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIRR vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than TQQQ's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.13%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.41%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIRR and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (22.79%) compared to AIRR (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIRR dropped -42.37% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.55% vs 22.05% for AIRR. On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, AIRR has been the lower-risk option at 9.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.55% return vs 22.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIRR is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.

AIRR is categorized as Building & Construction, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIRR and 0.95% for TQQQ.

AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIRR and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer