PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIRR vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIRR vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIRR achieves a 31.74% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 47.39% return.


AIRR

1D
0.83%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
31.74%
6M
28.77%
1Y
65.25%
3Y*
35.29%
5Y*
25.46%
10Y*
22.05%

QTUM

1D
1.22%
1M
9.88%
YTD
47.39%
6M
45.72%
1Y
82.93%
3Y*
48.15%
5Y*
28.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIRR vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
31.74%27.92%33.45%31.43%-2.08%33.01%17.17%33.97%-21.92%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
47.39%36.65%50.54%39.86%-28.80%35.18%42.05%47.99%-19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between AIRR and QTUM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018

0.67

The correlation between AIRR and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIRR vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIRR
QTUM

Industrials

84.6%
8.7%

Financial Services

9.6%

-

Energy

3.8%

-

Technology

0.5%
85.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

AIRR
84.6%
QTUM
8.7%

Financial Services

AIRR
9.6%
QTUM

-

Energy

AIRR
3.8%
QTUM

-

Technology

AIRR
0.5%
QTUM
85.1%

Basic Materials

AIRR

-

QTUM

-

Communication Services

AIRR

-

QTUM
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

AIRR

-

QTUM
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

AIRR

-

QTUM

-

Healthcare

AIRR

-

QTUM
0.6%

Real Estate

AIRR

-

QTUM

-

Utilities

AIRR

-

QTUM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIRR vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIRR vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIRRQTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

5.46

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.33

19.77

-1.43

AIRR vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIRR and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIRR vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIRR drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIRR and QTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIRRQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.37%

-38.45%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.09%

-15.26%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.95%

-25.39%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.95%

-38.45%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-4.42%

+2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-8.24%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

4.21%

-0.64%

Volatility

AIRR vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) is 9.32%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that AIRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIRRQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.32%

14.18%

-4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.81%

23.17%

-2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.19%

28.39%

-2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.45%

26.99%

-1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.36%

27.40%

-1.04%

AIRR vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIRR has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIRR vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than QTUM's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.13%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.73%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIRR and QTUM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTUM has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to AIRR (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIRR dropped -42.37% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 28.09% vs 25.46% for AIRR. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, AIRR has been the lower-risk option at 9.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 28.09% return vs 25.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.

AIRR is categorized as Building & Construction, while QTUM is Technology Equities. AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIRR and 0.40% for QTUM.

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIRR and QTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer