AIRR vs. QTUM
AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIRR returned 25.46%/yr vs 28.09%/yr for QTUM. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIRR charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
AIRR vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIRR achieves a 31.74% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 47.39% return.
AIRR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 31.74%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 65.25%
- 3Y*
- 35.29%
- 5Y*
- 25.46%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
QTUM
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 47.39%
- 6M
- 45.72%
- 1Y
- 82.93%
- 3Y*
- 48.15%
- 5Y*
- 28.09%
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.74% | 27.92% | 33.45% | 31.43% | -2.08% | 33.01% | 17.17% | 33.97% | -21.92% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 47.39% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIRR and QTUM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.67 |
The correlation between AIRR and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
AIRR vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIRR
QTUM
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
AIRR
QTUM
Financial Services
AIRR
QTUM
-
Energy
AIRR
QTUM
-
Technology
AIRR
QTUM
Basic Materials
AIRR
-
QTUM
-
Communication Services
AIRR
-
QTUM
Consumer Cyclical
AIRR
-
QTUM
Consumer Defensive
AIRR
-
QTUM
-
Healthcare
AIRR
-
QTUM
Real Estate
AIRR
-
QTUM
-
Utilities
AIRR
-
QTUM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIRR vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
AIRR
QTUM
AIRR vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIRR | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.46 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.01 | 5.46 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.33 | 19.77 | -1.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIRR vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIRR drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIRR and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIRR | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.37% | -38.45% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.09% | -15.26% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.95% | -25.39% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.95% | -38.45% | +10.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -4.42% | +2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -8.24% | +0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 4.21% | -0.64% |
Volatility
AIRR vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) is 9.32%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that AIRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIRR | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.32% | 14.18% | -4.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.81% | 23.17% | -2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.19% | 28.39% | -2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.45% | 26.99% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.36% | 27.40% | -1.04% |
AIRR vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIRR has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIRR vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than QTUM's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.73% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIRR and QTUM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to AIRR (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIRR dropped -42.37% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 28.09% vs 25.46% for AIRR. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, AIRR has been the lower-risk option at 9.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 28.09% return vs 25.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.
AIRR is categorized as Building & Construction, while QTUM is Technology Equities. AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIRR and 0.40% for QTUM.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIRR and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer