AIRR vs. INCE
AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) and INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while INCE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. AIRR is passively managed, while INCE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIRR returned 25.46%/yr vs 11.19%/yr for INCE. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIRR charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for INCE.
Performance
AIRR vs. INCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIRR achieves a 31.74% return, which is significantly higher than INCE's 13.74% return.
AIRR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 31.74%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 67.12%
- 3Y*
- 35.29%
- 5Y*
- 25.46%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
INCE
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 13.74%
- 6M
- 14.18%
- 1Y
- 26.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR vs. INCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.74% | 27.92% | 33.45% | 31.43% | -2.08% | 33.01% | 17.17% | 33.97% | -20.57% | 16.28% |
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 13.74% | 15.92% | 10.70% | 13.87% | -8.54% | 23.36% | 12.33% | 32.72% | -2.14% | 19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIRR and INCE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.62 |
The correlation between AIRR and INCE shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AIRR vs. INCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIRR
INCE
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
AIRR
INCE
Financial Services
AIRR
INCE
Energy
AIRR
INCE
Technology
AIRR
INCE
Basic Materials
AIRR
-
INCE
Communication Services
AIRR
-
INCE
Consumer Cyclical
AIRR
-
INCE
Consumer Defensive
AIRR
-
INCE
Healthcare
AIRR
-
INCE
Real Estate
AIRR
-
INCE
-
Utilities
AIRR
-
INCE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIRR vs. INCE — Risk / Return Rank
AIRR
INCE
AIRR vs. INCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIRR | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.55 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.01 | 5.18 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.33 | 19.39 | -1.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIRR vs. INCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIRR drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, which is greater than INCE's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIRR and INCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIRR | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.37% | -33.95% | -8.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.09% | -4.90% | -8.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.95% | -14.01% | -13.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.95% | -18.40% | -9.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -0.15% | -1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -3.25% | -4.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 1.31% | +2.26% |
Volatility
AIRR vs. INCE - Volatility Comparison
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a higher volatility of 9.32% compared to Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) at 2.42%. This indicates that AIRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIRR | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.32% | 2.42% | +6.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.81% | 6.07% | +14.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.19% | 8.41% | +17.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.45% | 13.28% | +12.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.36% | 15.68% | +10.68% |
AIRR vs. INCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIRR has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than INCE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIRR vs. INCE - Dividend Comparison
AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than INCE's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 4.70% | 4.71% | 3.25% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.44% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIRR and INCE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIRR has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to INCE (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIRR dropped -42.37% vs INCE's -33.95%.
On 5-year performance, AIRR leads with 25.46% vs 11.19% for INCE. On fees, INCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 25.46% return vs 11.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.
INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.
AIRR is categorized as Building & Construction, while INCE is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIRR and 0.29% for INCE.
INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIRR and INCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer