AIQ vs. YCS
AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIQ returned 16.16%/yr vs 23.52%/yr for YCS. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIQ charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
AIQ vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIQ achieves a 24.56% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 9.63% return.
AIQ
- 1D
- -5.57%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 24.56%
- 6M
- 23.60%
- 1Y
- 51.28%
- 3Y*
- 32.41%
- 5Y*
- 16.16%
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 23.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
AIQ vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 24.56% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 39.94% | -14.05% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.63% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | 1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIQ and YCS is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.04 |
The correlation between AIQ and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIQ vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
AIQ
YCS
AIQ vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIQ | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 3.78 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | 11.93 | -1.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIQ vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIQ drawdown since its inception was -44.66%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIQ and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIQ | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.66% | -49.56% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.47% | -8.30% | -8.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.35% | -23.05% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.66% | -27.32% | -17.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.68% | -0.14% | -9.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -19.87% | +10.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.11% | 2.65% | +2.46% |
Volatility
AIQ vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a higher volatility of 15.10% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that AIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIQ | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.10% | 2.25% | +12.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.68% | 12.19% | +10.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.54% | 16.93% | +9.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.01% | 21.10% | +4.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.84% | 18.82% | +7.02% |
AIQ vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIQ vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
AIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIQ and YCS have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIQ has higher volatility (15.10%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIQ dropped -44.66% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.52% vs 16.16% for AIQ. On fees, AIQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.52% return vs 16.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AIQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
AIQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
AIQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AIQ and 1.00% for YCS.
AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIQ and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer