PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIQ vs. XLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIQ vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIQ achieves a 30.85% return, which is significantly higher than XLP's 10.66% return.


AIQ

1D
3.98%
1M
9.03%
YTD
30.85%
6M
33.54%
1Y
60.30%
3Y*
33.19%
5Y*
18.01%
10Y*

XLP

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.99%
YTD
10.66%
6M
8.80%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
7.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIQ vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
30.85%31.89%24.11%55.39%-36.44%17.09%52.88%39.94%-14.05%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
10.66%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%5.43%

Correlation

The correlation between AIQ and XLP is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018

0.25

The correlation between AIQ and XLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AIQ vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIQ
XLP

Technology

77.4%

-

Communication Services

11.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
1.0%

Industrials

3.4%

-

Financial Services

0.5%

-

Healthcare

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

99.0%

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AIQ
77.4%
XLP

-

Communication Services

AIQ
11.0%
XLP

-

Consumer Cyclical

AIQ
7.2%
XLP
1.0%

Industrials

AIQ
3.4%
XLP

-

Financial Services

AIQ
0.5%
XLP

-

Healthcare

AIQ
0.4%
XLP

-

Basic Materials

AIQ

-

XLP

-

Consumer Defensive

AIQ

-

XLP
99.0%

Energy

AIQ

-

XLP

-

Real Estate

AIQ

-

XLP

-

Utilities

AIQ

-

XLP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIQ vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIQ vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIQXLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.12

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

0.88

+2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.07

1.70

+10.37

AIQ vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIQ and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIQ vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIQ drawdown since its inception was -44.66%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIQ and XLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIQXLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.66%

-35.90%

-8.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.47%

-9.69%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.35%

-12.39%

-13.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.66%

-16.30%

-28.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.12%

-4.50%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.79%

-7.06%

-2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

5.02%

-0.01%

Volatility

AIQ vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a higher volatility of 13.44% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 4.55%. This indicates that AIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIQXLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.44%

4.55%

+8.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.69%

10.13%

+11.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.60%

12.85%

+12.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.80%

13.34%

+12.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.74%

14.75%

+10.99%

AIQ vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIQ vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

AIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than XLP's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.14%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIQ and XLP have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to XLP (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIQ dropped -44.66% vs XLP's -35.90%.

On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 18.01% vs 6.92% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 18.01% return vs 6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.

AIQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AIQ and 0.08% for XLP.

AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIQ and XLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer