AIQ vs. GGTL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) and GGTL (Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. AIQ is passively managed, while GGTL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AIQ returned 32.41%/yr vs 21.46%/yr for GGTL. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIQ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for GGTL.

Performance

AIQ vs. GGTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AIQ having a 24.56% return and GGTL slightly lower at 23.84%.

AIQ

• 1D: -5.57%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: 24.56%
• 6M: 23.60%
• 1Y: 51.28%
• 3Y*: 32.41%
• 5Y*: 16.16%
• 10Y*: —

GGTL

• 1D: -4.64%
• 1M: 2.58%
• YTD: 23.84%
• 6M: 23.84%
• 1Y: 40.67%
• 3Y*: 21.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIQ vs. GGTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	24.56%	31.89%	24.11%	55.39%	-35.61%
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF	23.84%	19.78%	11.07%	18.17%	-16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between AIQ and GGTL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2022	0.77

The correlation between AIQ and GGTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIQ vs. GGTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIQ	GGTL
Technology	77.4%	55.5%
Communication Services	11.0%	2.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.2%	0.9%
Industrials	3.4%	0.1%
Financial Services	0.5%	-
Healthcare	0.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AIQ vs. GGTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIQ

AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 58
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 59

GGTL

GGTL Risk / Return Rank: 76
GGTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
GGTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
GGTL Omega Ratio Rank: 73
GGTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
GGTL Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIQ vs. GGTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIQ	GGTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	2.10	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.75	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.39	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	4.44	-1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.06	15.15	-5.09

AIQ vs. GGTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the GGTL Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIQ and GGTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AIQ vs. GGTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIQ drawdown since its inception was -44.66%, which is greater than GGTL's maximum drawdown of -23.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIQ and GGTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIQ	GGTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.66%	-23.65%	-21.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.47%	-9.20%	-7.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.35%	-21.46%	-4.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.68%	-4.64%	-5.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.78%	-7.40%	-2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.11%	2.69%	+2.42%

Volatility

AIQ vs. GGTL - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a higher volatility of 15.10% compared to Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) at 11.18%. This indicates that AIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIQ	GGTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.10%	11.18%	+3.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.68%	16.84%	+5.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.54%	19.45%	+7.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.01%	18.19%	+7.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.84%	18.19%	+7.65%

AIQ vs. GGTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than GGTL's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIQ vs. GGTL - Dividend Comparison

AIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than GGTL's 0.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	0.15%	0.18%	0.14%	0.16%	0.56%	0.15%	0.50%	0.51%	0.51%
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF	0.84%	1.04%	0.75%	0.84%	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIQ and GGTL in my portfolio?

AIQ and GGTL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIQ or GGTL?

AIQ has higher volatility (15.10%) compared to GGTL (11.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIQ dropped -44.66% vs GGTL's -23.65%.

Which ETF is better, AIQ or GGTL?

On 3-year performance, AIQ leads with 32.41% vs 21.46% for GGTL. On fees, AIQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, GGTL has been the lower-risk option at 11.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIQ or GGTL?

Over the 3-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 32.41% return vs 21.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIQ or GGTL?

AIQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GGTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIQ or GGTL?

GGTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.15% for AIQ.

What is the main difference between AIQ and GGTL?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AIQ and 0.90% for GGTL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.