AIOT vs. LPTH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) and LightPath Technologies, Inc. (LPTH).

Performance

AIOT vs. LPTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) and LightPath Technologies, Inc. (LPTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AIOT vs. LPTH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AIOT PowerFleet, Inc.	-42.11%	-20.12%	94.74%	27.14%	-43.25%	-36.20%	14.13%	16.46%	-19.45%	28.04%
LPTH LightPath Technologies, Inc.	-7.13%	205.95%	180.16%	3.28%	-50.00%	-37.76%	440.69%	-51.34%	-32.88%	44.16%

Fundamentals

Market Cap AIOT : $411.59M LPTH : $471.40M
EPS AIOT : -$0.27 LPTH : -$212.20
PS Ratio AIOT : 0.96 LPTH : 0.03
PB Ratio AIOT : 0.85 LPTH : 0.01
Total Revenue (TTM) AIOT : $429.98M LPTH : $16.39B
Gross Profit (TTM) AIOT : $235.02M LPTH : $6.03B
EBITDA (TTM) AIOT : $47.42M LPTH : -$592.31M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIOT achieves a -42.11% return, which is significantly lower than LPTH's -7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, AIOT has underperformed LPTH with an annualized return of -3.85%, while LPTH has yielded a comparatively higher 17.56% annualized return.

AIOT

• 1D: 6.21%
• 1M: -13.73%
• YTD: -42.11%
• 6M: -41.22%
• 1Y: -43.90%
• 3Y*: -3.52%
• 5Y*: -18.55%
• 10Y*: -3.85%

LPTH

• 1D: 7.73%
• 1M: -3.84%
• YTD: -7.13%
• 6M: 26.48%
• 1Y: 399.00%
• 3Y*: 92.32%
• 5Y*: 25.36%
• 10Y*: 17.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AIOT vs. LPTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIOT

AIOT Risk / Return Rank: 10
AIOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
AIOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
AIOT Omega Ratio Rank: 14
AIOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
AIOT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

LPTH

LPTH Risk / Return Rank: 96
LPTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LPTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
LPTH Omega Ratio Rank: 91
LPTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
LPTH Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIOT vs. LPTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) and LightPath Technologies, Inc. (LPTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIOT	LPTH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.69	3.63	-4.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.82	3.37	-4.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.41	-0.51
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	9.79	-10.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.88	24.62	-26.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AIOT vs. LPTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIOT Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the LPTH Sharpe Ratio of 3.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIOT and LPTH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIOT	LPTH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.69	3.63	-4.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.29	0.31	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.07	0.23	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	0.02	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between AIOT and LPTH is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AIOT vs. LPTH - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIOT nor LPTH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AIOT vs. LPTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIOT drawdown since its inception was -93.14%, smaller than the maximum LPTH drawdown of -99.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIOT and LPTH.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIOT	LPTH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.14%	-99.65%	+6.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.42%	-40.52%	-12.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-79.95%	-69.14%	-10.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.88%	-86.28%	+5.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.86%	-84.64%	-3.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.72%	-86.36%	+17.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.84%	16.11%	+7.73%

Volatility

AIOT vs. LPTH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) is 14.14%, while LightPath Technologies, Inc. (LPTH) has a volatility of 25.90%. This indicates that AIOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LPTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIOT	LPTH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.14%	25.90%	-11.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.11%	85.63%	-44.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.87%	110.83%	-46.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.34%	82.04%	-18.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.37%	78.19%	-20.82%

Financials

AIOT vs. LPTH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PowerFleet, Inc. and LightPath Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AIOT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PowerFleet, Inc. reported a gross profit of 62.69M and revenue of 113.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

LPTH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, LightPath Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.02B and revenue of 16.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

AIOT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PowerFleet, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.35M and revenue of 113.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.

LPTH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, LightPath Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -587.96M and revenue of 16.35B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.6%.

AIOT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PowerFleet, Inc. reported a net income of -3.36M and revenue of 113.49M, resulting in a net margin of -3.0%.

LPTH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, LightPath Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -9.41B and revenue of 16.35B, resulting in a net margin of -57.5%.