AINTX vs. CIGIX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

AINTX (Ariel International Fund) and CIGIX (Calamos International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, AINTX returned 7.20%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for CIGIX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AINTX charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for CIGIX.

Performance

AINTX vs. CIGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ariel International Fund (AINTX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINTX achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly lower than CIGIX's 21.65% return. Over the past 10 years, AINTX has underperformed CIGIX with an annualized return of 7.20%, while CIGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.47% annualized return.

AINTX

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: -0.00%
• 6M: 16.11%
• YTD: 16.76%
• 1Y: 24.39%
• 3Y*: 17.77%
• 5Y*: 9.11%
• 10Y*: 7.20%

CIGIX

• 1D: -3.12%
• 1M: -5.42%
• 6M: 13.40%
• YTD: 21.65%
• 1Y: 29.12%
• 3Y*: 19.80%
• 5Y*: 2.89%
• 10Y*: 9.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AINTX vs. CIGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AINTX Ariel International Fund	16.76%	31.39%	5.23%	10.02%	-11.33%	4.31%	6.84%	12.83%	-9.82%	16.35%
CIGIX Calamos International Growth Fund	21.65%	23.11%	12.51%	15.33%	-30.54%	-8.98%	44.95%	29.69%	-20.93%	39.54%

Correlation

The correlation between AINTX and CIGIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012	0.74

The correlation between AINTX and CIGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AINTX vs. CIGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AINTX

AINTX Risk / Return Rank: 43
AINTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
AINTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
AINTX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
AINTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
AINTX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

CIGIX

CIGIX Risk / Return Rank: 32
CIGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
CIGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
CIGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
CIGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
CIGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINTX vs. CIGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ariel International Fund (AINTX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AINTX	CIGIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.13	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	1.62	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.22	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	1.89	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.82	6.26	+0.56

AINTX vs. CIGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the CIGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINTX and CIGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AINTX vs. CIGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINTX drawdown since its inception was -27.95%, smaller than the maximum CIGIX drawdown of -64.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINTX and CIGIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AINTX	CIGIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.95%	-64.46%	+36.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.93%	-15.88%	+2.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.23%	-19.38%	+5.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.31%	-50.15%	+24.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.95%	-50.15%	+22.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-12.06%	+9.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.53%	-15.24%	+9.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	4.78%	-1.22%

Volatility

AINTX vs. CIGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ariel International Fund (AINTX) is 6.11%, while Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) has a volatility of 12.60%. This indicates that AINTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AINTX	CIGIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.11%	12.60%	-6.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.93%	24.08%	-10.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.16%	26.69%	-10.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.55%	21.96%	-7.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.60%	20.30%	-6.70%

AINTX vs. CIGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AINTX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than CIGIX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

AINTX vs. CIGIX - Dividend Comparison

AINTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.03%, more than CIGIX's 11.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AINTX Ariel International Fund	13.03%	15.21%	6.28%	1.64%	0.00%	2.54%	1.47%	1.59%	1.17%	1.76%	1.69%	0.20%
CIGIX Calamos International Growth Fund	11.09%	13.49%	4.54%	0.28%	0.00%	0.33%	5.42%	0.00%	13.25%	3.76%	0.00%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AINTX and CIGIX in my portfolio?

AINTX and CIGIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AINTX or CIGIX?

CIGIX has higher volatility (12.60%) compared to AINTX (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AINTX dropped -27.95% vs CIGIX's -64.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AINTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.