PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AINP vs. NFLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AINP vs. NFLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) and Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AINP vs. NFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AINP
Allspring Income Plus ETF
-0.28%7.53%-1.24%
NFLT
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF
0.17%8.77%-0.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINP achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than NFLT's 0.17% return.


AINP

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
-0.28%
6M
1.01%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFLT

1D
0.35%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
0.17%
6M
1.53%
1Y
6.87%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*
4.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AINP vs. NFLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AINP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLT's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AINP vs. NFLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AINP
AINP Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AINP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINP Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AINP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLT
NFLT Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINP vs. NFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) and Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AINPNFLTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

1.40

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

1.97

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.78

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.27

11.04

-3.77

AINP vs. NFLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINP Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the NFLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINP and NFLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AINPNFLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.40

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.83

+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between AINP and NFLT is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AINP vs. NFLT - Dividend Comparison

AINP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, less than NFLT's 5.64% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AINP
Allspring Income Plus ETF
5.49%5.03%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NFLT
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF
5.64%5.74%5.76%6.02%4.16%3.41%3.63%4.33%4.81%6.23%5.30%0.67%

Drawdowns

AINP vs. NFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINP drawdown since its inception was -2.61%, smaller than the maximum NFLT drawdown of -15.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINP and NFLT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AINPNFLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-15.17%

+12.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-2.45%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-1.34%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.46%

-2.13%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

0.64%

+0.04%

Volatility

AINP vs. NFLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) is 1.57%, while Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) has a volatility of 2.00%. This indicates that AINP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AINPNFLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

2.00%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.18%

3.02%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78%

4.93%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.62%

4.42%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.62%

4.93%

-1.31%