AINF.L vs. CRTC
AINF.L (iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Over the past year, AINF.L returned 120.54% vs 25.54% for CRTC. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
AINF.L vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AINF.L is traded in GBP, while CRTC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CRTC values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AINF.L achieves a 57.58% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 9.76% return.
AINF.L
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- 22.71%
- YTD
- 57.58%
- 6M
- 57.54%
- 1Y
- 120.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRTC
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 6.36%
- YTD
- 9.76%
- 6M
- 8.33%
- 1Y
- 25.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AINF.L vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AINF.L iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 57.58% | 34.74% | 0.43% |
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | 9.76% | 10.24% | -2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between AINF.L and CRTC is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024 | 0.52 |
The correlation between AINF.L and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AINF.L vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank
AINF.L
CRTC
AINF.L vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AINF.L | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | 1.38 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.78 | 3.29 | +7.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.61 | 9.51 | +27.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AINF.L | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.14 | 2.13 | +3.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.52 | 1.15 | +1.37 |
Drawdowns
AINF.L vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AINF.L drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.L and CRTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AINF.L | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.79% | -22.59% | -6.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.12% | -7.81% | -3.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -0.33% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -3.18% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 2.69% | +0.59% |
Volatility
AINF.L vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 2.99%. This indicates that AINF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AINF.L | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 2.99% | +6.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.58% | 8.55% | +9.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.30% | 12.06% | +11.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.52% | 15.58% | +10.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.52% | 15.58% | +10.94% |
Dividends
AINF.L vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison
AINF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AINF.L iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | 0.99% | 1.03% | 1.13% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AINF.L and CRTC have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers.
Find the right allocation for AINF.L and CRTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer