PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AINF.AS vs. SEC0.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AINF.AS vs. SEC0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) and iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AINF.AS is traded in USD, while SEC0.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SEC0.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINF.AS achieves a 60.14% return, which is significantly lower than SEC0.DE's 101.44% return.


AINF.AS

1D
0.12%
1M
27.63%
YTD
60.14%
6M
61.51%
1Y
124.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SEC0.DE

1D
1.79%
1M
32.09%
YTD
101.44%
6M
105.83%
1Y
210.42%
3Y*
61.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AINF.AS vs. SEC0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AINF.AS
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
60.14%44.70%-1.33%
SEC0.DE
iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
101.44%54.06%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between AINF.AS and SEC0.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024

0.91

The correlation between AINF.AS and SEC0.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AINF.AS vs. SEC0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AINF.AS
AINF.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SEC0.DE
SEC0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SEC0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEC0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEC0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SEC0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEC0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINF.AS vs. SEC0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) and iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AINF.ASSEC0.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.80

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.36

14.13

-3.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.07

52.77

-18.70

AINF.AS vs. SEC0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio is 4.96, which is comparable to the SEC0.DE Sharpe Ratio of 6.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINF.AS and SEC0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AINF.ASSEC0.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96

6.37

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.67

1.13

+1.53

Drawdowns

AINF.AS vs. SEC0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINF.AS drawdown since its inception was -27.26%, smaller than the maximum SEC0.DE drawdown of -45.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.AS and SEC0.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AINF.ASSEC0.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.26%

-45.36%

+18.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-14.80%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-13.42%

+9.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

3.97%

-0.37%

Volatility

AINF.AS vs. SEC0.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) is 9.59%, while iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) has a volatility of 13.28%. This indicates that AINF.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEC0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AINF.ASSEC0.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.59%

13.28%

-3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.09%

25.73%

-6.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.60%

32.87%

-8.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.91%

31.26%

-3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.91%

31.26%

-3.35%

AINF.AS vs. SEC0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AINF.AS and SEC0.DE have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

AINF.AS vs. SEC0.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AINF.AS nor SEC0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, AINF.AS and SEC0.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AINF.AS and SEC0.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

AINF.AS is categorized as Technology Equities, while SEC0.DE is Semiconductors. AINF.AS tracks STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Index, while SEC0.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AINF.AS and SEC0.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer