AINF.AS vs. IEMG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AINF.AS (iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AINF.AS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Index, while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AINF.AS returned 124.11% vs 52.58% for IEMG. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AINF.AS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.

Performance

AINF.AS vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINF.AS achieves a 60.14% return, which is significantly higher than IEMG's 26.21% return.

AINF.AS

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 27.63%
• YTD: 60.14%
• 6M: 61.51%
• 1Y: 124.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IEMG

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: 7.97%
• YTD: 26.21%
• 6M: 28.63%
• 1Y: 52.58%
• 3Y*: 23.55%
• 5Y*: 7.58%
• 10Y*: 10.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AINF.AS vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AINF.AS iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	60.14%	44.70%	-1.33%
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	26.21%	32.56%	-4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between AINF.AS and IEMG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024	0.57

The correlation between AINF.AS and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AINF.AS vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AINF.AS

AINF.AS Risk / Return Rank: 96
AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
AINF.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
AINF.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 95
AINF.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AINF.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 96

IEMG

IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 79
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINF.AS vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AINF.AS	IEMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.96	2.72	+2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.67	3.53	+2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.75	1.50	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.36	4.00	+6.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	34.07	15.38	+18.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AINF.AS vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio is 4.96, which is higher than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINF.AS and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AINF.AS	IEMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.96	2.72	+2.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.67	0.35	+2.31

Drawdowns

AINF.AS vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINF.AS drawdown since its inception was -27.26%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINF.AS and IEMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AINF.AS	IEMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.26%	-38.71%	+11.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.77%	-13.21%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.21%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.83%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.34%	+1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.21%	-12.97%	+8.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	3.43%	+0.17%

Volatility

AINF.AS vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) at 8.31%. This indicates that AINF.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AINF.AS	IEMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.59%	8.31%	+1.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.09%	16.93%	+2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.60%	19.43%	+5.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.91%	18.38%	+9.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.91%	20.03%	+7.88%

AINF.AS vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AINF.AS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

AINF.AS vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

AINF.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AINF.AS iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	2.18%	2.75%	3.20%	2.89%	2.71%	3.06%	1.87%	3.15%	2.76%	2.35%	2.28%	2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AINF.AS and IEMG in my portfolio?

AINF.AS and IEMG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AINF.AS or IEMG?

On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AINF.AS or IEMG?

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AINF.AS.

What is the main difference between AINF.AS and IEMG?

AINF.AS is categorized as Technology Equities, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. AINF.AS tracks STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AINF.AS and 0.09% for IEMG.