AIMS vs. SIXS
AIMS (Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF) and SIXS (6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIMS charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SIXS.
Performance
AIMS vs. SIXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AIMS
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIXS
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- 1Y
- 16.34%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- —
AIMS vs. SIXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AIMS Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF | 7.43% |
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF | -1.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIMS and SIXS is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIMS vs. SIXS — Risk / Return Rank
AIMS
SIXS
AIMS vs. SIXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF (AIMS) and 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIMS | SIXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 0.71 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
AIMS vs. SIXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIMS drawdown since its inception was -8.32%, smaller than the maximum SIXS drawdown of -27.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIMS and SIXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIMS | SIXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | -27.68% | +19.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -4.19% | +2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.33% | -8.95% | +6.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.37% | — |
Volatility
AIMS vs. SIXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIMS | SIXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.94% | 13.30% | +6.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 17.63% | +2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 19.66% | +0.28% |
AIMS vs. SIXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIMS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIMS vs. SIXS - Dividend Comparison
AIMS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIMS Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.09% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 0.94% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIMS and SIXS have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIMS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIMS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.
SIXS has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.00% for AIMS.
They also come from different issuers: Acuitas Investments and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIMS and 1.00% for SIXS.
Find the right allocation for AIMS and SIXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer