PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIMS vs. SIXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIMS vs. SIXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF (AIMS) and 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AIMS

1D
-1.35%
1M
2.72%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SIXS

1D
-1.24%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
5.36%
6M
6.16%
1Y
16.34%
3Y*
10.42%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIMS vs. SIXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIMS and SIXS is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIMS vs. SIXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIMS

SIXS
SIXS Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SIXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXS Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIMS vs. SIXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF (AIMS) and 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AIMS vs. SIXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIMSSIXSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

0.71

+0.60

Drawdowns

AIMS vs. SIXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIMS drawdown since its inception was -8.32%, smaller than the maximum SIXS drawdown of -27.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIMS and SIXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIMSSIXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-27.68%

+19.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-4.19%

+2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.33%

-8.95%

+6.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

Volatility

AIMS vs. SIXS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIMSSIXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.94%

13.30%

+6.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.94%

17.63%

+2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

19.66%

+0.28%

AIMS vs. SIXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIMS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIMS vs. SIXS - Dividend Comparison

AIMS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
AIMS
Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIXS
6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
1.81%1.62%1.09%1.60%1.37%0.94%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIMS and SIXS have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AIMS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIMS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.

SIXS has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.00% for AIMS.

They also come from different issuers: Acuitas Investments and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIMS and 1.00% for SIXS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIMS and SIXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer