PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIMS vs. OSCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIMS vs. OSCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF (AIMS) and Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AIMS

1D
-1.35%
1M
2.72%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OSCV

1D
-0.77%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
8.34%
6M
6.75%
1Y
13.62%
3Y*
10.05%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIMS vs. OSCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIMS and OSCV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026

0.82

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIMS vs. OSCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIMS

OSCV
OSCV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
OSCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSCV Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
OSCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSCV Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIMS vs. OSCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF (AIMS) and Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AIMS vs. OSCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIMSOSCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

0.36

+0.96

Drawdowns

AIMS vs. OSCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIMS drawdown since its inception was -8.32%, smaller than the maximum OSCV drawdown of -42.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIMS and OSCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIMSOSCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-42.40%

+34.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-3.46%

+2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.33%

-7.60%

+5.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

Volatility

AIMS vs. OSCV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIMSOSCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.94%

13.37%

+6.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.94%

17.26%

+2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

20.91%

-0.97%

AIMS vs. OSCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIMS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than OSCV's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIMS vs. OSCV - Dividend Comparison

AIMS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AIMS
Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OSCV
Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF
1.11%1.23%1.29%1.55%1.12%1.06%1.11%1.75%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIMS and OSCV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AIMS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIMS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OSCV.

OSCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.00% for AIMS.

They also come from different issuers: Acuitas Investments and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIMS and 0.79% for OSCV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIMS and OSCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer