AIMS vs. HSMV
AIMS (Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF) and HSMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AIMS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for HSMV.
Performance
AIMS vs. HSMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AIMS
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HSMV
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 13.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $44.61K | $54.43K | $71.07K | |
| $628.29K | $333.01K | $191.20K |
AIMS vs. HSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AIMS Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF | 9.76% |
HSMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF | 4.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIMS and HSMV is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIMS vs. HSMV — Risk / Return Rank
AIMS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HSMV
AIMS vs. HSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF (AIMS) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIMS | HSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIMS vs. HSMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIMS drawdown since its inception was -9.18%, smaller than the maximum HSMV drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIMS and HSMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIMS | HSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.18% | -19.16% | +9.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.44% | -1.74% | -3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -5.50% | +2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.59% | — |
Volatility
AIMS vs. HSMV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIMS | HSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.32% | 10.73% | +8.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 14.97% | +4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 15.97% | +3.35% |
AIMS vs. HSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIMS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HSMV's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIMS vs. HSMV - Dividend Comparison
AIMS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIMS Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HSMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF | 1.86% | 2.01% | 1.43% | 1.43% | 1.26% | 0.76% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIMS and HSMV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIMS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIMS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HSMV.
HSMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.00% for AIMS.
They also come from different issuers: Acuitas Investments and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIMS and 0.80% for HSMV.
Find the right allocation for AIMS and HSMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer