AIMNX vs. TGLMX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AIMNX (Horizon Active Income Fund) and TGLMX (TCW Total Return Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, AIMNX returned 0.68%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for TGLMX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIMNX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for TGLMX.

Performance

AIMNX vs. TGLMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Active Income Fund (AIMNX) and TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIMNX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than TGLMX's 1.25% return. Over the past 10 years, AIMNX has underperformed TGLMX with an annualized return of 0.68%, while TGLMX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.53% annualized return.

AIMNX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: 0.41%
• 1Y: 5.18%
• 3Y*: 3.54%
• 5Y*: -0.69%
• 10Y*: 0.68%

TGLMX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 1.25%
• 6M: 1.28%
• 1Y: 7.15%
• 3Y*: 4.76%
• 5Y*: -0.13%
• 10Y*: 1.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIMNX vs. TGLMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AIMNX Horizon Active Income Fund	0.41%	5.04%	1.77%	5.03%	-14.95%	-0.78%	7.65%	8.67%	-4.77%	4.10%
TGLMX TCW Total Return Bond Fund	1.25%	8.99%	1.82%	5.05%	-16.59%	-1.05%	8.32%	7.28%	0.80%	3.44%

Correlation

The correlation between AIMNX and TGLMX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.79

The correlation between AIMNX and TGLMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AIMNX vs. TGLMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIMNX

AIMNX Risk / Return Rank: 20
AIMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
AIMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
AIMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
AIMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
AIMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

TGLMX

TGLMX Risk / Return Rank: 36
TGLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
TGLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
TGLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
TGLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
TGLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIMNX vs. TGLMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Active Income Fund (AIMNX) and TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIMNX	TGLMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	1.57	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	2.38	-0.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.29	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	2.72	-1.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.67	8.30	-2.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AIMNX vs. TGLMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIMNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the TGLMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIMNX and TGLMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIMNX	TGLMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	1.57	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12	-0.02	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	0.28	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.40	-0.22

Drawdowns

AIMNX vs. TGLMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIMNX drawdown since its inception was -19.68%, smaller than the maximum TGLMX drawdown of -22.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIMNX and TGLMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIMNX	TGLMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.68%	-22.26%	+2.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.06%	-2.63%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.78%	-8.56%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.63%	-22.17%	+2.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.68%	-22.26%	+2.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.15%	-2.72%	-2.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.06%	-3.80%	-1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	0.86%	+0.05%

Volatility

AIMNX vs. TGLMX - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Active Income Fund (AIMNX) and TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX) have volatilities of 1.46% and 1.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIMNX	TGLMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.46%	1.44%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.94%	3.00%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.82%	4.40%	-0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.60%	7.05%	-1.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.09%	5.59%	-0.50%

AIMNX vs. TGLMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIMNX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than TGLMX's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIMNX vs. TGLMX - Dividend Comparison

AIMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than TGLMX's 6.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIMNX Horizon Active Income Fund	4.09%	4.03%	4.29%	3.78%	1.69%	1.88%	1.86%	2.73%	3.51%	2.47%	1.60%	1.66%
TGLMX TCW Total Return Bond Fund	6.74%	7.19%	6.52%	6.13%	3.27%	2.08%	3.37%	4.07%	3.55%	2.89%	4.13%	2.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIMNX and TGLMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, AIMNX and TGLMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AIMNX or TGLMX?

AIMNX has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to TGLMX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIMNX dropped -19.68% vs TGLMX's -22.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TGLMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.