AIMNX vs. FNILX
AIMNX (Horizon Active Income Fund) and FNILX (Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund) are both mutual funds - AIMNX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Horizon Investments, while FNILX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, AIMNX returned -0.69%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for FNILX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIMNX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FNILX.
Performance
AIMNX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIMNX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than FNILX's 11.27% return.
AIMNX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- 3.54%
- 5Y*
- -0.69%
- 10Y*
- 0.68%
FNILX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 29.11%
- 3Y*
- 22.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- —
AIMNX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIMNX Horizon Active Income Fund | 0.41% | 5.04% | 1.77% | 5.03% | -14.95% | -0.78% | 7.65% | 8.67% | -2.91% |
FNILX Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund | 11.27% | 17.81% | 25.47% | 27.45% | -19.37% | 26.67% | 21.13% | 31.79% | -13.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIMNX and FNILX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIMNX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank
AIMNX
FNILX
AIMNX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Active Income Fund (AIMNX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIMNX | FNILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 2.50 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.92 | 3.38 | -1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.45 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 3.30 | -1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.67 | 15.12 | -9.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIMNX | FNILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 2.50 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.81 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.76 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
AIMNX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIMNX drawdown since its inception was -19.68%, smaller than the maximum FNILX drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIMNX and FNILX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIMNX | FNILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.68% | -33.76% | +14.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | -9.01% | +5.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.78% | -19.08% | +12.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.63% | -25.40% | +5.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | 0.00% | -5.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -5.37% | +0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 1.97% | -1.06% |
Volatility
AIMNX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Horizon Active Income Fund (AIMNX) is 1.46%, while Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that AIMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIMNX | FNILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 2.88% | -1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.94% | 9.00% | -6.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 11.95% | -8.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.60% | 17.25% | -11.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.09% | 20.04% | -14.95% |
AIMNX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIMNX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIMNX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison
AIMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than FNILX's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIMNX Horizon Active Income Fund | 4.09% | 4.03% | 4.29% | 3.78% | 1.69% | 1.88% | 1.86% | 2.73% | 3.51% | 2.47% | 1.60% | 1.66% |
FNILX Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund | 0.91% | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 0.95% | 1.20% | 1.17% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIMNX and FNILX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNILX has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to AIMNX (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIMNX dropped -19.68% vs FNILX's -33.76%.
FNILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIMNX and FNILX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer