PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIMNX vs. PGSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIMNX vs. PGSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Active Income Fund (AIMNX) and Putnam Mortgage Securities Fund (PGSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIMNX achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than PGSIX's 2.64% return. Over the past 10 years, AIMNX has underperformed PGSIX with an annualized return of 0.62%, while PGSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.49% annualized return.


AIMNX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.54%
YTD
0.28%
6M
0.28%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
-0.83%
10Y*
0.62%

PGSIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.16%
YTD
2.64%
6M
2.78%
1Y
8.18%
3Y*
6.36%
5Y*
0.75%
10Y*
1.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIMNX vs. PGSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIMNX
Horizon Active Income Fund
0.28%5.04%1.77%5.03%-14.95%-0.78%7.65%8.67%-4.77%4.10%
PGSIX
Putnam Mortgage Securities Fund
2.64%9.36%3.52%3.66%-10.79%-4.31%-0.73%12.39%-0.79%0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between AIMNX and PGSIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.57

Over the past year, AIMNX and PGSIX have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIMNX vs. PGSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIMNX
AIMNX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
AIMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
AIMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PGSIX
PGSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PGSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PGSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIMNX vs. PGSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Active Income Fund (AIMNX) and Putnam Mortgage Securities Fund (PGSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIMNXPGSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

2.98

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.43

9.97

-5.54

AIMNX vs. PGSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIMNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the PGSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIMNX and PGSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIMNX vs. PGSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIMNX drawdown since its inception was -19.68%, smaller than the maximum PGSIX drawdown of -22.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIMNX and PGSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIMNXPGSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.68%

-22.28%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-2.85%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.78%

-6.88%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.63%

-19.20%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.68%

-22.28%

+2.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-0.50%

-4.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-2.60%

-2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.85%

+0.11%

Volatility

AIMNX vs. PGSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Active Income Fund (AIMNX) is 1.29%, while Putnam Mortgage Securities Fund (PGSIX) has a volatility of 1.51%. This indicates that AIMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIMNXPGSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

1.51%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

3.49%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86%

5.00%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.62%

7.01%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.10%

5.96%

-0.86%

AIMNX vs. PGSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AIMNX and PGSIX have an expense ratio of 0.89%.


Dividends

AIMNX vs. PGSIX - Dividend Comparison

AIMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than PGSIX's 4.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIMNX
Horizon Active Income Fund
4.09%4.03%4.29%3.78%1.69%1.88%1.86%2.73%3.51%2.47%1.60%1.66%
PGSIX
Putnam Mortgage Securities Fund
4.64%5.67%16.88%8.38%12.83%4.30%4.21%4.50%3.94%3.10%2.92%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIMNX and PGSIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGSIX has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to AIMNX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIMNX dropped -19.68% vs PGSIX's -22.28%.

PGSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIMNX and PGSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer