PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIGS.L vs. FAGR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIGS.L vs. FAGR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Softs (AIGS.L) and WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated (FAGR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIGS.L achieves a -12.24% return, which is significantly lower than FAGR.L's 5.54% return.


AIGS.L

1D
-2.05%
1M
-9.93%
YTD
-12.24%
6M
-15.11%
1Y
-13.13%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
2.26%

FAGR.L

1D
-2.30%
1M
-5.58%
YTD
5.54%
6M
1.56%
1Y
3.36%
3Y*
0.10%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIGS.L vs. FAGR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AIGS.L
WisdomTree Softs
-12.24%2.96%25.45%20.14%-4.35%43.50%-0.54%14.90%
FAGR.L
WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated
5.54%0.20%-7.02%-4.05%16.44%29.51%11.44%6.28%

Correlation

The correlation between AIGS.L and FAGR.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2019

0.26

Over the past year, AIGS.L and FAGR.L have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIGS.L vs. FAGR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIGS.L
AIGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
AIGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

FAGR.L
FAGR.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FAGR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAGR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAGR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FAGR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAGR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIGS.L vs. FAGR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Softs (AIGS.L) and WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated (FAGR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIGS.LFAGR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.05

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

0.43

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.07

0.82

-1.90

AIGS.L vs. FAGR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIGS.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the FAGR.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIGS.L and FAGR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIGS.LFAGR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.62

0.27

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.21

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.76

-0.77

Drawdowns

AIGS.L vs. FAGR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIGS.L drawdown since its inception was -79.63%, which is greater than FAGR.L's maximum drawdown of -29.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGS.L and FAGR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIGS.LFAGR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.63%

-29.85%

-49.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.61%

-7.81%

-15.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.19%

-22.43%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.19%

-29.85%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.04%

-19.52%

-30.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.34%

-15.30%

-35.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.23%

4.07%

+8.16%

Volatility

AIGS.L vs. FAGR.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Softs (AIGS.L) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated (FAGR.L) at 5.73%. This indicates that AIGS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAGR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIGS.LFAGR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

5.73%

+1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.09%

9.37%

+5.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.18%

12.55%

+8.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

22.75%

-1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

25.90%

-5.99%

AIGS.L vs. FAGR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AIGS.L and FAGR.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

AIGS.L vs. FAGR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIGS.L nor FAGR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AIGS.L and FAGR.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIGS.L and FAGR.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

AIGS.L tracks Bloomberg Softs, while FAGR.L tracks Bloomberg Agriculture 3 Month Forward.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIGS.L and FAGR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer