PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIGP.L vs. PPDX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIGP.L vs. PPDX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) and WisdomTree Physical Palladium (PPDX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AIGP.L is traded in USD, while PPDX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PPDX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIGP.L achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly higher than PPDX.L's -16.77% return.


AIGP.L

1D
0.43%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
4.36%
6M
12.47%
1Y
48.36%
3Y*
33.51%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
12.03%

PPDX.L

1D
-0.92%
1M
-14.24%
YTD
-16.77%
6M
-9.92%
1Y
31.08%
3Y*
-2.61%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIGP.L vs. PPDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AIGP.L
WisdomTree Precious Metals
4.36%78.63%23.25%9.96%
PPDX.L
WisdomTree Physical Palladium
-16.77%74.24%-19.47%-38.85%

Correlation

The correlation between AIGP.L and PPDX.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2023

0.47

The correlation between AIGP.L and PPDX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIGP.L vs. PPDX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIGP.L
AIGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
AIGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

PPDX.L
PPDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PPDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PPDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIGP.L vs. PPDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) and WisdomTree Physical Palladium (PPDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIGP.LPPDX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.15

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

0.84

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.13

1.82

+3.31

AIGP.L vs. PPDX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIGP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the PPDX.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIGP.L and PPDX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIGP.LPPDX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

0.72

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

-0.21

+0.63

Drawdowns

AIGP.L vs. PPDX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIGP.L drawdown since its inception was -55.05%, roughly equal to the maximum PPDX.L drawdown of -53.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGP.L and PPDX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIGP.LPPDX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.05%

-53.14%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.14%

-38.31%

+15.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.14%

-40.25%

+17.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.70%

-38.31%

+17.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.79%

-36.24%

+9.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.41%

17.69%

-8.28%

Volatility

AIGP.L vs. PPDX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) is 8.30%, while WisdomTree Physical Palladium (PPDX.L) has a volatility of 10.38%. This indicates that AIGP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIGP.LPPDX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.30%

10.38%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.82%

37.69%

-9.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.70%

44.97%

-14.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.26%

45.46%

-23.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.07%

45.46%

-25.39%

AIGP.L vs. PPDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AIGP.L and PPDX.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

AIGP.L vs. PPDX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIGP.L nor PPDX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AIGP.L and PPDX.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIGP.L and PPDX.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

AIGP.L tracks Bloomberg Precious Metals, while PPDX.L tracks LBMA Palladium Price.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIGP.L and PPDX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer