AIGP.L vs. PCOM.DE
AIGP.L (WisdomTree Precious Metals) and PCOM.DE (WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIGP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Bloomberg Precious Metals, while PCOM.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AIGP.L returned 33.51%/yr vs 16.53%/yr for PCOM.DE. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIGP.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for PCOM.DE.
Performance
AIGP.L vs. PCOM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AIGP.L is traded in USD, while PCOM.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PCOM.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIGP.L achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly lower than PCOM.DE's 23.71% return.
AIGP.L
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- 4.36%
- 6M
- 11.88%
- 1Y
- 48.11%
- 3Y*
- 33.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.70%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
PCOM.DE
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 23.71%
- 6M
- 25.72%
- 1Y
- 40.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIGP.L vs. PCOM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIGP.L WisdomTree Precious Metals | 4.36% | 78.63% | 23.25% | 7.81% | -0.87% | 2.86% |
PCOM.DE WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF | 23.71% | 18.64% | 4.57% | -7.45% | 13.18% | 3.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIGP.L and PCOM.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021 | 0.31 |
The correlation between AIGP.L and PCOM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.34 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIGP.L vs. PCOM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AIGP.L
PCOM.DE
AIGP.L vs. PCOM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) and WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (PCOM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIGP.L | PCOM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.39 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 5.46 | -3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 12.10 | -6.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIGP.L | PCOM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.14 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.68 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
AIGP.L vs. PCOM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIGP.L drawdown since its inception was -55.05%, which is greater than PCOM.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGP.L and PCOM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIGP.L | PCOM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.05% | -26.21% | -28.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.14% | -7.24% | -15.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.14% | -11.30% | -11.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.70% | -4.33% | -16.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.79% | -14.97% | -11.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.41% | 3.27% | +6.14% |
Volatility
AIGP.L vs. PCOM.DE - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) has a higher volatility of 8.30% compared to WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (PCOM.DE) at 6.11%. This indicates that AIGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCOM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIGP.L | PCOM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.30% | 6.11% | +2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.82% | 16.60% | +11.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.70% | 18.51% | +12.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.26% | 17.63% | +4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 17.63% | +2.44% |
AIGP.L vs. PCOM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIGP.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PCOM.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIGP.L vs. PCOM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AIGP.L nor PCOM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AIGP.L and PCOM.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PCOM.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PCOM.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIGP.L.
AIGP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while PCOM.DE is Commodities. AIGP.L tracks Bloomberg Precious Metals, while PCOM.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIGP.L and 0.19% for PCOM.DE.
Find the right allocation for AIGP.L and PCOM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer