AIGC.L vs. CXAP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AIGC.L (WisdomTree Broad Commodities) and CXAP.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Commodities funds - AIGC.L tracks the Bloomberg Commodity while CXAP.L tracks the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AIGC.L returned 5.99%/yr vs 11.05%/yr for CXAP.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIGC.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for CXAP.L.

Performance

AIGC.L vs. CXAP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Broad Commodities (AIGC.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

AIGC.L is traded in USD, while CXAP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CXAP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AIGC.L having a 24.32% return and CXAP.L slightly higher at 25.04%. Over the past 10 years, AIGC.L has underperformed CXAP.L with an annualized return of 5.99%, while CXAP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.05% annualized return.

AIGC.L

• 1D: -1.47%
• 1M: -4.07%
• YTD: 24.32%
• 6M: 24.87%
• 1Y: 37.57%
• 3Y*: 14.90%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: 5.99%

CXAP.L

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 25.04%
• 6M: 27.82%
• 1Y: 43.46%
• 3Y*: 17.79%
• 5Y*: 13.35%
• 10Y*: 11.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIGC.L vs. CXAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AIGC.L WisdomTree Broad Commodities	24.32%	16.03%	2.05%	-6.41%	13.22%	26.42%	-3.80%	7.16%	-11.46%	0.80%
CXAP.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	25.04%	18.99%	6.86%	-5.88%	14.04%	35.55%	-2.02%	11.45%	-11.34%	15.06%

Correlation

The correlation between AIGC.L and CXAP.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2016	0.74

The correlation between AIGC.L and CXAP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (10 years) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AIGC.L vs. CXAP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIGC.L

AIGC.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
AIGC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
AIGC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AIGC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
AIGC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
AIGC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

CXAP.L

CXAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
CXAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CXAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CXAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CXAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CXAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIGC.L vs. CXAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Broad Commodities (AIGC.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIGC.L	CXAP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	2.86	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	3.69	-0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.50	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.28	6.41	-1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.07	18.98	-6.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AIGC.L vs. CXAP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIGC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the CXAP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIGC.L and CXAP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIGC.L	CXAP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	2.86	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.78	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.67	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	0.69	-0.71

Drawdowns

AIGC.L vs. CXAP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIGC.L drawdown since its inception was -75.92%, which is greater than CXAP.L's maximum drawdown of -36.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGC.L and CXAP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIGC.L	CXAP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.92%	-36.00%	-39.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.09%	-6.75%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.23%	-12.96%	+1.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.98%	-22.98%	-4.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.00%	-36.00%	+2.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.42%	-2.24%	-35.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.02%	-9.09%	-41.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	2.28%	+0.82%

Volatility

AIGC.L vs. CXAP.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Broad Commodities (AIGC.L) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) at 4.55%. This indicates that AIGC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CXAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIGC.L	CXAP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.88%	4.55%	+1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.18%	12.96%	+2.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.07%	15.13%	+1.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.14%	17.21%	+0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.76%	16.48%	-0.72%

AIGC.L vs. CXAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIGC.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CXAP.L's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIGC.L vs. CXAP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIGC.L nor CXAP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIGC.L and CXAP.L in my portfolio?

AIGC.L and CXAP.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIGC.L or CXAP.L?

On fees, CXAP.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIGC.L or CXAP.L?

CXAP.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIGC.L.

What is the main difference between AIGC.L and CXAP.L?

AIGC.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while CXAP.L tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIGC.L and 0.34% for CXAP.L.