PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIGA.L vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIGA.L vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Agriculture (AIGA.L) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIGA.L achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's -1.88% return. Over the past 10 years, AIGA.L has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 0.17%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 12.27% annualized return.


AIGA.L

1D
0.66%
1M
-6.87%
YTD
3.57%
6M
4.10%
1Y
-0.81%
3Y*
-4.71%
5Y*
2.68%
10Y*
0.17%

IAU

1D
-2.28%
1M
-7.14%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
-2.59%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
29.05%
5Y*
18.87%
10Y*
12.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIGA.L vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIGA.L
WisdomTree Agriculture
3.57%-2.00%-6.82%-4.27%13.91%25.62%14.26%0.00%-17.58%0.00%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-1.88%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AIGA.L and IAU is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.11

The correlation between AIGA.L and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIGA.L vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIGA.L
AIGA.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
AIGA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIGA.L vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Agriculture (AIGA.L) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIGA.LIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.19

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

1.02

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.17

2.85

-3.02

AIGA.L vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIGA.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIGA.L and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIGA.L vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIGA.L drawdown since its inception was -67.98%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGA.L and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIGA.LIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.98%

-45.14%

-22.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.57%

-24.40%

+13.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.75%

-24.40%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.61%

-24.40%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.38%

-24.40%

-18.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.51%

-21.59%

-20.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.31%

-15.97%

-25.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.64%

8.73%

-4.09%

Volatility

AIGA.L vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Agriculture (AIGA.L) is 3.44%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that AIGA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIGA.LIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

8.28%

-4.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

24.16%

-13.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

27.30%

-13.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

18.16%

-1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.30%

16.05%

+12.25%

AIGA.L vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIGA.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIGA.L vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIGA.L nor IAU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AIGA.L and IAU have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIGA.L.

AIGA.L is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while IAU is Gold. AIGA.L tracks Bloomberg Agriculture, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIGA.L and 0.25% for IAU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIGA.L and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer