AIGA.L vs. COTN.L
AIGA.L (WisdomTree Agriculture) and COTN.L (WisdomTree Cotton) are both Agricultural Commodities funds from WisdomTree - AIGA.L tracks the Bloomberg Agriculture while COTN.L tracks the Bloomberg Cotton. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AIGA.L returned -0.04%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for COTN.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
AIGA.L vs. COTN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIGA.L achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly lower than COTN.L's 9.87% return. Over the past 10 years, AIGA.L has underperformed COTN.L with an annualized return of -0.04%, while COTN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 1.32% annualized return.
AIGA.L
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- -5.69%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- 0.60%
- 3Y*
- -1.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- -0.04%
COTN.L
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -10.94%
- YTD
- 9.87%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 3.74%
- 3Y*
- -7.96%
- 5Y*
- -0.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.32%
AIGA.L vs. COTN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIGA.L WisdomTree Agriculture | 3.39% | -1.87% | -6.84% | -4.32% | 13.91% | 25.62% | 14.26% | 0.00% | -10.92% | -12.14% |
COTN.L WisdomTree Cotton | 9.87% | -11.34% | -16.60% | -1.06% | -8.04% | 41.68% | 7.77% | -7.05% | -7.59% | 10.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIGA.L and COTN.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2006 | 0.35 |
The correlation between AIGA.L and COTN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIGA.L vs. COTN.L — Risk / Return Rank
AIGA.L
COTN.L
AIGA.L vs. COTN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Agriculture (AIGA.L) and WisdomTree Cotton (COTN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIGA.L | COTN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.06 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | 0.27 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 0.63 | -0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIGA.L | COTN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 | 0.24 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | -0.00 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.00 | 0.05 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | -0.00 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
AIGA.L vs. COTN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIGA.L drawdown since its inception was -68.40%, smaller than the maximum COTN.L drawdown of -73.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGA.L and COTN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIGA.L | COTN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.40% | -73.59% | +5.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.37% | -15.44% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.70% | -43.70% | +20.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.58% | -53.70% | +25.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | -53.70% | +7.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.33% | -57.25% | +13.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.51% | -49.78% | +10.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.25% | 6.57% | -2.32% |
Volatility
AIGA.L vs. COTN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Agriculture (AIGA.L) is 6.51%, while WisdomTree Cotton (COTN.L) has a volatility of 10.54%. This indicates that AIGA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COTN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIGA.L | COTN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 10.54% | -4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.26% | 15.14% | -4.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.44% | 17.16% | -3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 27.57% | -10.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.70% | 25.06% | -9.36% |
AIGA.L vs. COTN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AIGA.L and COTN.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
AIGA.L vs. COTN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AIGA.L nor COTN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AIGA.L and COTN.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIGA.L and COTN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
AIGA.L tracks Bloomberg Agriculture, while COTN.L tracks Bloomberg Cotton.
Find the right allocation for AIGA.L and COTN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer