PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIFRX vs. CSUIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIFRX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AIFRX having a 12.73% return and CSUIX slightly lower at 12.30%. Over the past 10 years, AIFRX has outperformed CSUIX with an annualized return of 9.99%, while CSUIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.58% annualized return.


AIFRX

1D
-0.45%
1M
-0.52%
6M
6.77%
YTD
12.73%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
9.99%
ALL TIME*
11.19%

CSUIX

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.23%
6M
8.51%
YTD
12.30%
1Y
17.67%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
7.58%
ALL TIME*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AIFRX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIFRX
abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund
12.73%26.92%2.88%13.10%-7.95%15.61%1.87%28.41%-9.31%25.24%
CSUIX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.
12.30%14.69%8.74%2.46%-4.89%16.60%-1.29%24.72%-5.52%18.15%

Correlation

The correlation between AIFRX and CSUIX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009

0.87

The correlation between AIFRX and CSUIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIFRX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIFRX
AIFRX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AIFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
AIFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CSUIX
CSUIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CSUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIFRX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIFRXCSUIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

3.08

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.50

9.77

+0.74

AIFRX vs. CSUIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIFRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the CSUIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIFRX and CSUIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIFRX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIFRX drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFRX and CSUIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIFRXCSUIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.38%

-52.01%

+13.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-5.96%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.40%

-11.74%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-20.01%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.38%

-35.01%

-3.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.30%

-1.98%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-8.11%

+2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.87%

+0.04%

Volatility

AIFRX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund (AIFRX) is 2.77%, while Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that AIFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIFRXCSUIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

2.95%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

8.16%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

10.13%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.00%

12.97%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

14.87%

+0.89%

AIFRX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIFRX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIFRX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison

AIFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, less than CSUIX's 7.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIFRX
abrdn Global Infrastructure Fund
7.01%7.80%8.13%3.46%4.86%5.31%3.45%4.01%3.96%3.80%4.37%4.55%
CSUIX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.
7.93%8.41%2.58%2.53%3.91%3.25%1.64%1.83%2.45%5.12%2.35%6.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIFRX and CSUIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSUIX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to AIFRX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIFRX dropped -38.38% vs CSUIX's -52.01%.

AIFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIFRX and CSUIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer