PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIEQ vs. NACP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIEQ vs. NACP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIEQ achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 20.21% return.


AIEQ

1D
-1.27%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
8.03%
6M
7.07%
1Y
19.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NACP

1D
-2.21%
1M
1.73%
YTD
20.21%
6M
17.87%
1Y
39.41%
3Y*
25.74%
5Y*
15.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIEQ vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AIEQ
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF
8.03%13.96%15.21%
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
20.21%21.38%19.86%

Correlation

The correlation between AIEQ and NACP is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2024

0.87

The correlation between AIEQ and NACP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIEQ vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIEQ
NACP

Technology

39.7%
41.3%

Financial Services

11.7%
9.5%

Communication Services

11.2%
9.0%

Industrials

10.4%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
10.9%

Healthcare

6.7%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
3.1%

Basic Materials

2.8%
1.4%

Energy

2.8%
4.3%

Utilities

0.3%
3.0%

Real Estate

0.2%
1.1%

Technology

AIEQ
39.7%
NACP
41.3%

Financial Services

AIEQ
11.7%
NACP
9.5%

Communication Services

AIEQ
11.2%
NACP
9.0%

Industrials

AIEQ
10.4%
NACP
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

AIEQ
9.7%
NACP
10.9%

Healthcare

AIEQ
6.7%
NACP
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

AIEQ
4.6%
NACP
3.1%

Basic Materials

AIEQ
2.8%
NACP
1.4%

Energy

AIEQ
2.8%
NACP
4.3%

Utilities

AIEQ
0.3%
NACP
3.0%

Real Estate

AIEQ
0.2%
NACP
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIEQ vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIEQ
AIEQ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AIEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
AIEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

NACP
NACP Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIEQ vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIEQNACPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.45

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

4.10

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

17.54

-9.54

AIEQ vs. NACP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the NACP Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIEQ and NACP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIEQ vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIEQ drawdown since its inception was -24.19%, smaller than the maximum NACP drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIEQ and NACP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIEQNACPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.19%

-30.96%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-9.65%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.85%

-2.27%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-5.72%

+2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

2.25%

+0.15%

Volatility

AIEQ vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) is 4.68%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that AIEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIEQNACPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

6.98%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

12.73%

-2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.87%

15.25%

-2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.47%

17.69%

+1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.47%

18.77%

+0.70%

AIEQ vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIEQ vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison

AIEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than NACP's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AIEQ
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF
0.40%0.43%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
0.56%0.62%2.96%1.28%3.48%3.06%1.48%1.22%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIEQ and NACP have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NACP has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to AIEQ (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIEQ dropped -24.19% vs NACP's -30.96%.

On 1-year performance, NACP leads with 39.41% vs 19.15% for AIEQ. On fees, NACP is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, AIEQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NACP has performed better with a 39.41% return vs 19.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NACP is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIEQ.

NACP has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.40% for AIEQ.

AIEQ tracks AI Powered Equity Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIEQ and 0.49% for NACP.

NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIEQ and NACP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer