AIEQ vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AIEQ (AI Powered Equity ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIEQ charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

AIEQ vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AIEQ

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 4.61%
• YTD: 11.01%
• 6M: 11.21%
• 1Y: 23.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIEQ vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AIEQ AI Powered Equity ETF	0.31%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between AIEQ and GRW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.70

AIEQ vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIEQ	GRW
Technology	35.7%	26.6%
Financial Services	13.1%	9.8%
Communication Services	12.3%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	8.3%
Industrials	8.3%	38.1%
Healthcare	7.1%	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.7%	-
Energy	2.7%	-
Basic Materials	2.4%	4.0%
Real Estate	1.7%	-
Utilities	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

AIEQ vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIEQ

AIEQ Risk / Return Rank: 56
AIEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
AIEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
AIEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 57
AIEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
AIEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIEQ vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIEQ	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.92	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIEQ	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	13.58	-12.70

Drawdowns

AIEQ vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIEQ drawdown since its inception was -24.19%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIEQ and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIEQ	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.19%	-0.45%	-23.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-0.27%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.31%	-0.17%	-3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIEQ	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.05%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.37%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.32%	8.89%	+3.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.46%	8.89%	+10.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.46%	8.89%	+10.57%

AIEQ vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIEQ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIEQ vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

AIEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AIEQ AI Powered Equity ETF	0.39%	0.43%	0.65%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIEQ and GRW in my portfolio?

AIEQ and GRW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIEQ or GRW?

On fees, GRW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIEQ or GRW?

GRW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for AIEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIEQ or GRW?

AIEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between AIEQ and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for AIEQ and 0.75% for GRW.