PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIEQ vs. BAGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIEQ vs. BAGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) and Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIEQ achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly higher than BAGY's -24.57% return.


AIEQ

1D
1.31%
1M
1.25%
YTD
9.94%
6M
9.90%
1Y
22.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAGY

1D
-2.16%
1M
-19.66%
YTD
-24.57%
6M
-24.49%
1Y
-38.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIEQ vs. BAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIEQ and BAGY is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIEQ vs. BAGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIEQ
AIEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
AIEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
AIEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BAGY
BAGY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIEQ vs. BAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) and Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIEQBAGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.85

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

-0.77

+3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.19

-1.37

+10.56

AIEQ vs. BAGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the BAGY Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIEQ and BAGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIEQ vs. BAGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIEQ drawdown since its inception was -24.19%, smaller than the maximum BAGY drawdown of -49.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIEQ and BAGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIEQBAGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.19%

-49.84%

+25.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-49.84%

+40.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-46.93%

+45.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-20.58%

+17.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

28.03%

-25.64%

Volatility

AIEQ vs. BAGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) is 4.58%, while Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) has a volatility of 13.49%. This indicates that AIEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIEQBAGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

13.49%

-8.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

33.73%

-23.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.79%

42.67%

-29.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.48%

41.23%

-21.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.48%

41.23%

-21.75%

AIEQ vs. BAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIEQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BAGY's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIEQ vs. BAGY - Dividend Comparison

AIEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than BAGY's 60.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AIEQ
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF
0.39%0.43%0.65%
BAGY
Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF
60.30%30.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIEQ and BAGY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAGY has higher volatility (13.49%) compared to AIEQ (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIEQ dropped -24.19% vs BAGY's -49.84%.

On 1-year performance, AIEQ leads with 22.25% vs -38.16% for BAGY. On fees, BAGY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, AIEQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIEQ has performed better with a 22.25% return vs -38.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BAGY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIEQ.

BAGY has the higher dividend yield at 60.30%, compared with 0.39% for AIEQ.

AIEQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BAGY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIEQ and 0.65% for BAGY.

AIEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIEQ and BAGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer