PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIBD vs. SOXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIBD vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bear 2X Shares (AIBD) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIBD achieves a -38.68% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -91.63% return.


AIBD

1D
4.30%
1M
-24.36%
YTD
-38.68%
6M
-33.54%
1Y
-59.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOXS

1D
5.91%
1M
-54.82%
YTD
-91.63%
6M
-91.49%
1Y
-97.52%
3Y*
-86.60%
5Y*
-79.43%
10Y*
-78.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIBD vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AIBD
Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bear 2X Shares
-38.68%-49.15%-33.02%
SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares
-91.63%-85.53%-19.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AIBD and SOXS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2024

0.72

The correlation between AIBD and SOXS shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIBD vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIBD
AIBD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
AIBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIBD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
AIBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIBD Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXS
SOXS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SOXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIBD vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bear 2X Shares (AIBD) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIBDSOXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

0.59

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

-1.00

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.78

-1.43

-0.36

AIBD vs. SOXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIBD Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is comparable to the SOXS Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIBD and SOXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIBDSOXSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.17

-0.96

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.95

-0.79

-0.16

Drawdowns

AIBD vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIBD drawdown since its inception was -82.11%, smaller than the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIBD and SOXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIBDSOXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.11%

-100.00%

+17.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.47%

-97.68%

+36.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.34%

-100.00%

+18.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.17%

-92.61%

+44.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.38%

68.11%

-34.73%

Volatility

AIBD vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bear 2X Shares (AIBD) is 14.63%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a volatility of 44.24%. This indicates that AIBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIBDSOXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.63%

44.24%

-29.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.40%

84.19%

-46.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.16%

102.19%

-51.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.52%

108.21%

-51.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.52%

100.48%

-43.96%

AIBD vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIBD has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIBD vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison

AIBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, less than SOXS's 64.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AIBD
Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bear 2X Shares
5.68%4.37%3.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares
64.53%10.79%5.45%9.22%0.19%0.00%3.58%2.30%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIBD and SOXS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXS has higher volatility (44.24%) compared to AIBD (14.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIBD dropped -82.11% vs SOXS's -100.00%.

On 1-year performance, AIBD leads with -59.55% vs -97.52% for SOXS. On fees, AIBD is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, AIBD has been the lower-risk option at 14.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIBD has performed better with a -59.55% return vs -97.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIBD is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.

SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 64.53%, compared with 5.68% for AIBD.

AIBD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SOXS is Leveraged Equities. AIBD tracks Solactive US AI & Big Data Index, while SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AIBD and 1.08% for SOXS.

SOXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.95 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIBD and SOXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer