AIBD vs. SEF
AIBD (Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bear 2X Shares) and SEF (ProShares Short Financials) are both Inverse Equities funds - AIBD tracks the Solactive US AI & Big Data Index while SEF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AIBD returned -59.55% vs 3.73% for SEF. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIBD charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SEF.
Performance
AIBD vs. SEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIBD achieves a -38.68% return, which is significantly lower than SEF's 8.89% return.
AIBD
- 1D
- 4.30%
- 1M
- -24.36%
- YTD
- -38.68%
- 6M
- -33.54%
- 1Y
- -59.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEF
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- -10.34%
- 5Y*
- -5.21%
- 10Y*
- -11.50%
AIBD vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AIBD Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bear 2X Shares | -38.68% | -49.15% | -33.02% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 8.89% | -9.82% | -10.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIBD and SEF is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2024 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIBD vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank
AIBD
SEF
AIBD vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bear 2X Shares (AIBD) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIBD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.06 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 0.39 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.78 | 0.73 | -2.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIBD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.17 | 0.26 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.95 | -0.49 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
AIBD vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIBD drawdown since its inception was -82.11%, smaller than the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIBD and SEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIBD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.11% | -96.51% | +14.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.47% | -9.72% | -51.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.34% | -96.09% | +14.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.17% | -82.72% | +34.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.38% | 5.14% | +28.24% |
Volatility
AIBD vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bear 2X Shares (AIBD) has a higher volatility of 14.63% compared to ProShares Short Financials (SEF) at 3.01%. This indicates that AIBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIBD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.63% | 3.01% | +11.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.40% | 10.85% | +26.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.16% | 14.34% | +36.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.52% | 17.96% | +38.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.52% | 20.52% | +36.00% |
AIBD vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIBD has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SEF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIBD vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison
AIBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than SEF's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIBD Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bear 2X Shares | 5.68% | 4.37% | 3.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.35% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIBD and SEF have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIBD has higher volatility (14.63%) compared to SEF (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIBD dropped -82.11% vs SEF's -96.51%.
On 1-year performance, SEF leads with 3.73% vs -59.55% for AIBD. On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SEF has performed better with a 3.73% return vs -59.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AIBD.
AIBD has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 3.35% for SEF.
AIBD tracks Solactive US AI & Big Data Index, while SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AIBD and 0.95% for SEF.
SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIBD and SEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer