AIAI.L vs. XDWH.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AIAI.L (L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF) and XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - AIAI.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XDWH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIAI.L returned 18.10%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for XDWH.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIAI.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.L.

Performance

AIAI.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIAI.L achieves a 42.35% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -2.74% return.

AIAI.L

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: 18.80%
• YTD: 42.35%
• 6M: 39.03%
• 1Y: 75.99%
• 3Y*: 38.01%
• 5Y*: 18.10%
• 10Y*: —

XDWH.L

• 1D: 2.99%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: -2.74%
• 6M: -1.48%
• 1Y: 11.78%
• 3Y*: 5.50%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIAI.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AIAI.L L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF	42.35%	30.30%	18.45%	59.58%	-40.29%	9.81%	68.60%	3.43%
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C	-2.74%	15.25%	0.75%	3.81%	-5.42%	20.56%	12.88%	11.29%

Correlation

The correlation between AIAI.L and XDWH.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2019	0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between AIAI.L and XDWH.L has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AIAI.L vs. XDWH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIAI.L	XDWH.L
Technology	71.5%	-
Communication Services	10.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	-
Healthcare	5.7%	98.9%
Financial Services	1.3%	-
Industrials	1.1%	-
Real Estate	0.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.5%
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AIAI.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIAI.L

AIAI.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
AIAI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
AIAI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AIAI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 78
AIAI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AIAI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

XDWH.L

XDWH.L Risk / Return Rank: 24
XDWH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
XDWH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
XDWH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 23
XDWH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
XDWH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIAI.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIAI.L	XDWH.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.00	0.79	+2.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	1.29	+2.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.15	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.73	1.11	+3.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.60	2.80	+11.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AIAI.L vs. XDWH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIAI.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the XDWH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIAI.L and XDWH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIAI.L	XDWH.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.00	0.79	+2.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.32	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.57	+0.20

Drawdowns

AIAI.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIAI.L drawdown since its inception was -49.61%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIAI.L and XDWH.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIAI.L	XDWH.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.61%	-26.24%	-23.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.80%	-10.39%	-6.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.96%	-19.28%	-10.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.61%	-19.28%	-30.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.83%	-5.82%	+3.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.16%	-4.98%	-9.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.45%	4.12%	+1.33%

Volatility

AIAI.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) at 4.80%. This indicates that AIAI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIAI.L	XDWH.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.67%	4.80%	+5.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.49%	10.77%	+9.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.55%	14.57%	+11.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.59%	14.18%	+14.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.81%	14.97%	+13.84%

AIAI.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIAI.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIAI.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIAI.L nor XDWH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIAI.L and XDWH.L in my portfolio?

AIAI.L and XDWH.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIAI.L or XDWH.L?

On fees, XDWH.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIAI.L or XDWH.L?

XDWH.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIAI.L.

What is the main difference between AIAI.L and XDWH.L?

AIAI.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XDWH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. AIAI.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIAI.L and 0.25% for XDWH.L.