AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L
AIAI.L (L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF) and LDAG.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIAI.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while LDAG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIAI.L returned 18.10%/yr vs 8.80%/yr for LDAG.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIAI.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LDAG.L.
Performance
AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AIAI.L is traded in USD, while LDAG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LDAG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIAI.L achieves a 42.35% return, which is significantly higher than LDAG.L's 15.67% return.
AIAI.L
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- 20.66%
- YTD
- 42.35%
- 6M
- 40.34%
- 1Y
- 77.74%
- 3Y*
- 38.01%
- 5Y*
- 18.10%
- 10Y*
- —
LDAG.L
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 15.67%
- 6M
- 15.63%
- 1Y
- 35.97%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- —
AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIAI.L L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF | 42.35% | 30.30% | 18.45% | 59.58% | -40.29% | 4.62% |
LDAG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 15.67% | 35.95% | 3.74% | 8.72% | -9.15% | -2.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIAI.L and LDAG.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2021 | 0.55 |
The correlation between AIAI.L and LDAG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIAI.L
LDAG.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
AIAI.L
LDAG.L
Communication Services
AIAI.L
LDAG.L
Consumer Cyclical
AIAI.L
LDAG.L
Healthcare
AIAI.L
LDAG.L
Financial Services
AIAI.L
LDAG.L
Industrials
AIAI.L
LDAG.L
Real Estate
AIAI.L
LDAG.L
Basic Materials
AIAI.L
-
LDAG.L
Consumer Defensive
AIAI.L
-
LDAG.L
Energy
AIAI.L
-
LDAG.L
Utilities
AIAI.L
-
LDAG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L — Risk / Return Rank
AIAI.L
LDAG.L
AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIAI.L | LDAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.40 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.73 | 3.29 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.60 | 9.94 | +4.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIAI.L | LDAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00 | 2.35 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.56 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.59 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIAI.L drawdown since its inception was -49.61%, which is greater than LDAG.L's maximum drawdown of -28.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIAI.L and LDAG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIAI.L | LDAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.61% | -28.97% | -20.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.80% | -10.88% | -5.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.96% | -17.50% | -12.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.61% | -28.97% | -20.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -3.35% | +1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.16% | -7.76% | -6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.45% | 3.61% | +1.84% |
Volatility
AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L) at 5.03%. This indicates that AIAI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIAI.L | LDAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.67% | 5.03% | +5.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.49% | 12.02% | +8.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.55% | 15.37% | +11.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.59% | 15.59% | +13.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.81% | 15.56% | +13.25% |
AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIAI.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LDAG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Dividend Comparison
AIAI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDAG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIAI.L L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDAG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 3.78% | 4.23% | 4.75% | 5.40% | 4.80% | 2.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIAI.L and LDAG.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDAG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDAG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIAI.L.
AIAI.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while LDAG.L is Asia Pacific Equities. AIAI.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while LDAG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIAI.L and 0.40% for LDAG.L.
Find the right allocation for AIAI.L and LDAG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer