PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AIAI.L is traded in USD, while LDAG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LDAG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIAI.L achieves a 42.35% return, which is significantly higher than LDAG.L's 15.67% return.


AIAI.L

1D
-1.83%
1M
20.66%
YTD
42.35%
6M
40.34%
1Y
77.74%
3Y*
38.01%
5Y*
18.10%
10Y*

LDAG.L

1D
-1.50%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
15.67%
6M
15.63%
1Y
35.97%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AIAI.L
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF
42.35%30.30%18.45%59.58%-40.29%4.62%
LDAG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF
15.67%35.95%3.74%8.72%-9.15%-2.54%

Correlation

The correlation between AIAI.L and LDAG.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2021

0.55

The correlation between AIAI.L and LDAG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIAI.L
LDAG.L

Technology

71.5%
6.5%

Communication Services

10.3%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
11.1%

Healthcare

5.7%
2.8%

Financial Services

1.3%
34.9%

Industrials

1.1%
12.3%

Real Estate

0.9%
0.3%

Basic Materials

-

5.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.1%

Energy

-

3.7%

Utilities

-

11.6%

Technology

AIAI.L
71.5%
LDAG.L
6.5%

Communication Services

AIAI.L
10.3%
LDAG.L
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

AIAI.L
9.2%
LDAG.L
11.1%

Healthcare

AIAI.L
5.7%
LDAG.L
2.8%

Financial Services

AIAI.L
1.3%
LDAG.L
34.9%

Industrials

AIAI.L
1.1%
LDAG.L
12.3%

Real Estate

AIAI.L
0.9%
LDAG.L
0.3%

Basic Materials

AIAI.L

-

LDAG.L
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

AIAI.L

-

LDAG.L
7.1%

Energy

AIAI.L

-

LDAG.L
3.7%

Utilities

AIAI.L

-

LDAG.L
11.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIAI.L
AIAI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AIAI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIAI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIAI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AIAI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIAI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

LDAG.L
LDAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LDAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LDAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIAI.LLDAG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.40

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

3.29

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.60

9.94

+4.66

AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIAI.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the LDAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIAI.L and LDAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIAI.LLDAG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

2.35

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.56

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.59

+0.18

Drawdowns

AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIAI.L drawdown since its inception was -49.61%, which is greater than LDAG.L's maximum drawdown of -28.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIAI.L and LDAG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIAI.LLDAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.61%

-28.97%

-20.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.80%

-10.88%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.96%

-17.50%

-12.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.61%

-28.97%

-20.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-3.35%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-7.76%

-6.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.45%

3.61%

+1.84%

Volatility

AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAI.L) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L) at 5.03%. This indicates that AIAI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIAI.LLDAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.67%

5.03%

+5.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.49%

12.02%

+8.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.55%

15.37%

+11.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.59%

15.59%

+13.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.81%

15.56%

+13.25%

AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIAI.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LDAG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIAI.L vs. LDAG.L - Dividend Comparison

AIAI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDAG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AIAI.L
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LDAG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF
3.78%4.23%4.75%5.40%4.80%2.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIAI.L and LDAG.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LDAG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LDAG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIAI.L.

AIAI.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while LDAG.L is Asia Pacific Equities. AIAI.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while LDAG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AIAI.L and 0.40% for LDAG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIAI.L and LDAG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer