PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIA vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIA vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIA achieves a 44.56% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -1.50% return.


AIA

1D
0.54%
1M
6.70%
YTD
44.56%
6M
50.54%
1Y
83.79%
3Y*
34.57%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
15.05%

SHLD

1D
-2.04%
1M
2.37%
YTD
-1.50%
6M
-1.03%
1Y
8.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIA vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
44.56%47.79%20.26%2.32%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-1.50%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between AIA and SHLD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.33

AIA vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIA
SHLD

Technology

63.8%
12.2%

Financial Services

16.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%

-

Communication Services

7.4%

-

Industrials

2.0%
87.8%

Healthcare

0.8%

-

Energy

0.6%

-

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AIA
63.8%
SHLD
12.2%

Financial Services

AIA
16.4%
SHLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

AIA
8.6%
SHLD

-

Communication Services

AIA
7.4%
SHLD

-

Industrials

AIA
2.0%
SHLD
87.8%

Healthcare

AIA
0.8%
SHLD

-

Energy

AIA
0.6%
SHLD

-

Real Estate

AIA
0.5%
SHLD

-

Basic Materials

AIA

-

SHLD

-

Consumer Defensive

AIA

-

SHLD

-

Utilities

AIA

-

SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIA vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIA
AIA Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIA Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIA vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIASHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.09

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

0.52

+5.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.76

1.28

+18.47

AIA vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIA Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIA and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIA vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIA drawdown since its inception was -60.89%, which is greater than SHLD's maximum drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIA and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIASHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.89%

-20.10%

-40.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.15%

-20.10%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.44%

-18.20%

+11.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.66%

-3.34%

-13.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

8.12%

-4.04%

Volatility

AIA vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a higher volatility of 14.34% compared to Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) at 9.05%. This indicates that AIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIASHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.34%

9.05%

+5.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.49%

19.94%

+4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.93%

24.55%

+3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.96%

21.29%

+4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.78%

21.29%

+2.49%

AIA vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AIA and SHLD have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

AIA vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than SHLD's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
1.73%2.50%2.78%2.07%2.59%1.54%1.11%2.24%2.49%1.45%2.29%2.88%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.56%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIA and SHLD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIA has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to SHLD (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIA dropped -60.89% vs SHLD's -20.10%.

On 1-year performance, AIA leads with 83.79% vs 8.26% for SHLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, SHLD has been the lower-risk option at 9.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIA has performed better with a 83.79% return vs 8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIA and SHLD have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

AIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.56% for SHLD.

AIA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. AIA tracks S&P Asia 50, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X.

AIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIA and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer