AIA vs. EMMF
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF).
AIA and EMMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AIA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Asia 50. It was launched on Nov 13, 2007. EMMF is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Aug 10, 2018.
Performance
AIA vs. EMMF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AIA vs. EMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 8.86% | 47.79% | 20.26% | 4.32% | -24.08% | -10.91% | 33.73% | 22.21% | -9.56% |
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 5.23% | 21.22% | 9.45% | 20.59% | -13.47% | 5.97% | 9.25% | 2.30% | -6.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIA achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly higher than EMMF's 5.23% return.
AIA
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- -10.06%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 14.17%
- 1Y
- 50.84%
- 3Y*
- 22.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
EMMF
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AIA vs. EMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EMMF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AIA vs. EMMF — Risk / Return Rank
AIA
EMMF
AIA vs. EMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIA | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 1.66 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 2.25 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.34 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 2.58 | +0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.92 | 10.52 | +1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIA | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.66 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.53 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.39 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between AIA and EMMF is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AIA vs. EMMF - Dividend Comparison
AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than EMMF's 2.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 2.30% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 1.54% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.49% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% |
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 2.25% | 2.45% | 1.30% | 1.62% | 3.48% | 2.64% | 1.93% | 2.93% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AIA vs. EMMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIA drawdown since its inception was -60.89%, which is greater than EMMF's maximum drawdown of -32.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIA and EMMF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIA | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.89% | -32.57% | -28.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.68% | -10.62% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.12% | -25.20% | -25.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.73% | -7.68% | -3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.82% | -7.58% | -9.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.24% | 2.61% | +1.63% |
Volatility
AIA vs. EMMF - Volatility Comparison
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a higher volatility of 12.54% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) at 9.11%. This indicates that AIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AIA | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.54% | 9.11% | +3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.46% | 12.48% | +6.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.39% | 16.91% | +9.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 14.01% | +10.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.19% | 16.45% | +6.74% |