AHYQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE
AHYQ.DE (Amundi MSCI World III UCITS ETF Dist) and WRLD.DE (Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - AHYQ.DE tracks the MSCI World while WRLD.DE tracks the Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AHYQ.DE returned 17.53%/yr vs 10.05%/yr for WRLD.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AHYQ.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for WRLD.DE.
Performance
AHYQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AHYQ.DE achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly lower than WRLD.DE's 18.45% return.
AHYQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 10.93%
- 6M
- 10.78%
- 1Y
- 23.61%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
WRLD.DE
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 18.45%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- 1Y
- 26.89%
- 3Y*
- 10.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AHYQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHYQ.DE Amundi MSCI World III UCITS ETF Dist | 10.93% | 7.92% | 25.91% | 20.09% | -15.16% | 10.27% |
WRLD.DE Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF | 18.45% | 11.71% | 1.59% | 11.63% | -16.39% | 8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between AHYQ.DE and WRLD.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between AHYQ.DE and WRLD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AHYQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AHYQ.DE
WRLD.DE
AHYQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World III UCITS ETF Dist (AHYQ.DE) and Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AHYQ.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 3.57 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.39 | 11.33 | +3.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AHYQ.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 1.91 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.38 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
AHYQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHYQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.70%, which is greater than WRLD.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHYQ.DE and WRLD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AHYQ.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.70% | -23.55% | -10.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.60% | -7.90% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.77% | -19.51% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.38% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -9.51% | +5.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 2.50% | -0.85% |
Volatility
AHYQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World III UCITS ETF Dist (AHYQ.DE) is 2.64%, while Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that AHYQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AHYQ.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 4.50% | -1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.77% | 11.34% | -3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.28% | 14.81% | -3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 16.98% | -2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 16.98% | -1.69% |
AHYQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AHYQ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WRLD.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
AHYQ.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
AHYQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, while WRLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AHYQ.DE Amundi MSCI World III UCITS ETF Dist | 1.06% | 1.18% | 1.65% | 1.78% |
WRLD.DE Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AHYQ.DE and WRLD.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AHYQ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AHYQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for WRLD.DE.
AHYQ.DE tracks MSCI World, while WRLD.DE tracks Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AHYQ.DE and 0.55% for WRLD.DE.
Find the right allocation for AHYQ.DE and WRLD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer