PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHYH.DE vs. LOWD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHYH.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Global Aggregate SRI 1-5 UCITS ETF Hedged EUR (AHYH.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHYH.DE achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than LOWD.DE's 10.58% return.


AHYH.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.03%
YTD
-0.20%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
1.25%
3Y*
2.59%
5Y*
10Y*

LOWD.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
6.40%
YTD
10.58%
6M
11.04%
1Y
16.30%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHYH.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AHYH.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate SRI 1-5 UCITS ETF Hedged EUR
-0.20%3.12%2.55%3.20%0.34%
LOWD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc
10.58%4.27%25.87%26.12%6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between AHYH.DE and LOWD.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.09

The correlation between AHYH.DE and LOWD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHYH.DE vs. LOWD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHYH.DE
AHYH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AHYH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHYH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHYH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
AHYH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHYH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

LOWD.DE
LOWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LOWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHYH.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Aggregate SRI 1-5 UCITS ETF Hedged EUR (AHYH.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AHYH.DELOWD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.24

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

2.06

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

6.55

-4.66

AHYH.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHYH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the LOWD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHYH.DE and LOWD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AHYH.DELOWD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

1.33

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.98

-0.18

Drawdowns

AHYH.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHYH.DE drawdown since its inception was -1.86%, smaller than the maximum LOWD.DE drawdown of -19.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHYH.DE and LOWD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHYH.DELOWD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-19.08%

+17.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.59%

-7.90%

+6.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.59%

-19.08%

+17.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

0.00%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.49%

-3.98%

+3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

2.49%

-1.94%

Volatility

AHYH.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Global Aggregate SRI 1-5 UCITS ETF Hedged EUR (AHYH.DE) is 0.61%, while BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that AHYH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOWD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHYH.DELOWD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

4.29%

-3.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.00%

9.56%

-7.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27%

12.24%

-9.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.07%

14.21%

-11.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.07%

14.21%

-11.14%

AHYH.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHYH.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than LOWD.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

AHYH.DE vs. LOWD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AHYH.DE nor LOWD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AHYH.DE and LOWD.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AHYH.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AHYH.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LOWD.DE.

AHYH.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while LOWD.DE is Global Equities. AHYH.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 500MM ex Securitized Sustainable SRI 1-5 Year Sector Neutral (EUR Hedged), while LOWD.DE tracks Low Carbon 300 World PAB. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for AHYH.DE and 0.30% for LOWD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHYH.DE and LOWD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer