PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHYF.DE vs. KLMH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHYF.DE vs. KLMH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Global Aggregate SRI 1-5 UCITS ETF USD (AHYF.DE) and Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (KLMH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHYF.DE achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than KLMH.DE's -0.23% return.


AHYF.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.79%
6M
1.12%
YTD
1.96%
1Y
2.72%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
10Y*

KLMH.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
-1.09%
6M
-1.07%
YTD
-0.23%
1Y
0.41%
3Y*
2.57%
5Y*
-2.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHYF.DE vs. KLMH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AHYF.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate SRI 1-5 UCITS ETF USD
1.96%-3.21%5.06%0.94%-4.47%
KLMH.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
-0.23%1.14%1.55%7.19%-6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between AHYF.DE and KLMH.DE is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2022

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHYF.DE vs. KLMH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHYF.DE
AHYF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
AHYF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHYF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHYF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
AHYF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHYF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

KLMH.DE
KLMH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KLMH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLMH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLMH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
KLMH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLMH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHYF.DE vs. KLMH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Aggregate SRI 1-5 UCITS ETF USD (AHYF.DE) and Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (KLMH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AHYF.DEKLMH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.02

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

0.16

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.53

0.40

+3.12

AHYF.DE vs. KLMH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHYF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the KLMH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHYF.DE and KLMH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AHYF.DE vs. KLMH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHYF.DE drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, smaller than the maximum KLMH.DE drawdown of -24.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHYF.DE and KLMH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHYF.DEKLMH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-24.67%

+16.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.78%

-3.18%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.93%

-3.80%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

-15.53%

+12.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-9.61%

+5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

1.27%

-0.50%

Volatility

AHYF.DE vs. KLMH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Global Aggregate SRI 1-5 UCITS ETF USD (AHYF.DE) is 0.76%, while Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (KLMH.DE) has a volatility of 1.44%. This indicates that AHYF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLMH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHYF.DEKLMH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

1.44%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.07%

4.13%

-2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18%

5.08%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.42%

6.20%

-1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.42%

5.47%

-1.05%

AHYF.DE vs. KLMH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHYF.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than KLMH.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

AHYF.DE vs. KLMH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AHYF.DE nor KLMH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AHYF.DE and KLMH.DE have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AHYF.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AHYF.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for KLMH.DE.

AHYF.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 500MM ex Securitized Sustainable SRI 1-5 Year Sector Neutral, while KLMH.DE tracks Solactive Green Bond Index (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.14% for AHYF.DE and 0.30% for KLMH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHYF.DE and KLMH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer