PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHYD.DE vs. HGGA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHYD.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged EUR (AHYD.DE) and HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHYD.DE achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than HGGA.DE's 1.31% return.


AHYD.DE

1D
0.38%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
-0.28%
1Y
0.67%
3Y*
1.67%
5Y*
10Y*

HGGA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.50%
YTD
1.31%
6M
0.88%
1Y
0.39%
3Y*
0.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHYD.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AHYD.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged EUR
-0.33%2.02%0.67%4.41%-4.51%
HGGA.DE
HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF
1.31%-4.17%5.69%0.16%-4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between AHYD.DE and HGGA.DE is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2022

0.02

The correlation between AHYD.DE and HGGA.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHYD.DE vs. HGGA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHYD.DE
AHYD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
AHYD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHYD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHYD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
AHYD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHYD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

HGGA.DE
HGGA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHYD.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged EUR (AHYD.DE) and HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AHYD.DEHGGA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.01

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

0.08

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.55

0.17

+0.38

AHYD.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHYD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the HGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHYD.DE and HGGA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AHYD.DEHGGA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

0.05

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.04

+0.07

Drawdowns

AHYD.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHYD.DE drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, which is greater than HGGA.DE's maximum drawdown of -8.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHYD.DE and HGGA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHYD.DEHGGA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-8.58%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.32%

-2.04%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.78%

-6.78%

+3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-4.56%

+2.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.57%

-4.18%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

1.02%

+0.17%

Volatility

AHYD.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged EUR (AHYD.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.60% compared to HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE) at 0.53%. This indicates that AHYD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HGGA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHYD.DEHGGA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

0.53%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

2.33%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.71%

3.42%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.73%

4.98%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.73%

4.98%

-0.25%

AHYD.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHYD.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than HGGA.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AHYD.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AHYD.DE nor HGGA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AHYD.DE and HGGA.DE have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AHYD.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AHYD.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HGGA.DE.

AHYD.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 500MM ex Securitized Sustainable SRI Sector Neutral (EUR Hedged), while HGGA.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 1-3 SRI Carbon ESG-Weighted. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for AHYD.DE and 0.18% for HGGA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHYD.DE and HGGA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer