PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHYB.DE vs. IS0Z.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHYB.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYB.DE) and iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AHYB.DE is traded in USD, while IS0Z.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IS0Z.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHYB.DE achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly higher than IS0Z.DE's 0.13% return.


AHYB.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
0.29%
6M
0.47%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
10Y*

IS0Z.DE

1D
0.18%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.78%
1Y
1.96%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
-3.02%
10Y*
-0.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHYB.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AHYB.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD
0.29%4.31%1.94%7.01%-1.60%
IS0Z.DE
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.11%10.77%-5.01%7.69%-2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between AHYB.DE and IS0Z.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022

0.73

The correlation between AHYB.DE and IS0Z.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHYB.DE vs. IS0Z.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHYB.DE
AHYB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AHYB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHYB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHYB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
AHYB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHYB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

IS0Z.DE
IS0Z.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IS0Z.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS0Z.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS0Z.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
IS0Z.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS0Z.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHYB.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYB.DE) and iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AHYB.DEIS0Z.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.05

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

0.39

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.73

0.97

+1.76

AHYB.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHYB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the IS0Z.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHYB.DE and IS0Z.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AHYB.DEIS0Z.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

0.27

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

-0.07

+0.69

Drawdowns

AHYB.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHYB.DE drawdown since its inception was -8.62%, smaller than the maximum IS0Z.DE drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHYB.DE and IS0Z.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHYB.DEIS0Z.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-33.09%

+24.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-5.03%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.27%

-10.06%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-17.48%

+16.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.13%

-10.73%

+8.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

2.02%

-1.08%

Volatility

AHYB.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYB.DE) is 1.54%, while iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that AHYB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS0Z.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHYB.DEIS0Z.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

2.34%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

5.36%

-2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58%

7.22%

-3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.74%

9.06%

-4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.74%

8.24%

-3.50%

AHYB.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHYB.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than IS0Z.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AHYB.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Dividend Comparison

AHYB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IS0Z.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHYB.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IS0Z.DE
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.67%2.51%2.30%1.57%0.80%0.47%0.62%0.88%0.90%0.82%0.84%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


AHYB.DE and IS0Z.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AHYB.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AHYB.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IS0Z.DE.

AHYB.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 500MM ex Securitized Sustainable SRI Sector Neutral (USD Hedged), while IS0Z.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Government AAA-AA Capped Bond. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for AHYB.DE and 0.20% for IS0Z.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHYB.DE and IS0Z.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer