PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHYA.DE vs. HGGA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHYA.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYA.DE) and HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AHYA.DE is traded in USD, while HGGA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the HGGA.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHYA.DE achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than HGGA.DE's 0.14% return.


AHYA.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
0.41%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
2.06%
3Y*
2.65%
5Y*
10Y*

HGGA.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
0.14%
6M
0.65%
1Y
1.89%
3Y*
3.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHYA.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AHYA.DE
Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies UCITS ETF Hedged USD
-0.05%3.73%1.27%5.70%-2.53%
HGGA.DE
HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF
0.14%8.18%-0.35%3.32%0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between AHYA.DE and HGGA.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHYA.DE vs. HGGA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHYA.DE
AHYA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
AHYA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHYA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHYA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
AHYA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHYA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

HGGA.DE
HGGA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHYA.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYA.DE) and HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AHYA.DEHGGA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.08

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

0.74

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.97

1.79

+0.18

AHYA.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHYA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the HGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHYA.DE and HGGA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AHYA.DEHGGA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

0.42

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.14

+0.29

Drawdowns

AHYA.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHYA.DE drawdown since its inception was -8.05%, smaller than the maximum HGGA.DE drawdown of -13.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHYA.DE and HGGA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHYA.DEHGGA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.05%

-13.47%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-2.54%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.86%

-4.35%

+0.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-1.53%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-5.04%

+2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.06%

-0.02%

Volatility

AHYA.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYA.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE) at 0.96%. This indicates that AHYA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HGGA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHYA.DEHGGA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

0.96%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

3.20%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54%

4.55%

-1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.67%

5.56%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.67%

5.56%

-0.89%

AHYA.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHYA.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than HGGA.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AHYA.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AHYA.DE nor HGGA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AHYA.DE and HGGA.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HGGA.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HGGA.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for AHYA.DE.

AHYA.DE tracks JP Morgan Government Bond Global (USD Hedged), while HGGA.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 1-3 SRI Carbon ESG-Weighted. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for AHYA.DE and 0.18% for HGGA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHYA.DE and HGGA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer