PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHMFX vs. AGTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHMFX vs. AGTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHMFX achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than AGTHX's 9.21% return. Over the past 10 years, AHMFX has underperformed AGTHX with an annualized return of 3.48%, while AGTHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.88% annualized return.


AHMFX

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.86%
YTD
2.26%
6M
2.77%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
6.37%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
3.48%

AGTHX

1D
-0.80%
1M
5.21%
YTD
9.21%
6M
8.74%
1Y
24.73%
3Y*
24.82%
5Y*
12.08%
10Y*
15.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHMFX vs. AGTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AHMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2
2.26%6.03%6.45%7.04%-12.44%5.49%4.61%9.12%1.80%9.09%
AGTHX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A
9.21%19.73%28.02%37.22%-30.75%19.32%37.83%28.16%-3.15%26.14%

Correlation

The correlation between AHMFX and AGTHX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

-0.06

The correlation between AHMFX and AGTHX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.13 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHMFX vs. AGTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHMFX
AHMFX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AHMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AHMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

AGTHX
AGTHX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
AGTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
AGTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHMFX vs. AGTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AHMFXAGTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.30

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

1.84

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.17

7.17

+4.00

AHMFX vs. AGTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the AGTHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHMFX and AGTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AHMFXAGTHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

1.67

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.60

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.81

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

0.71

+0.84

Drawdowns

AHMFX vs. AGTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHMFX drawdown since its inception was -17.65%, smaller than the maximum AGTHX drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHMFX and AGTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHMFXAGTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.65%

-51.91%

+34.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-13.76%

+11.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.20%

-21.57%

+15.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.65%

-36.38%

+18.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.65%

-36.38%

+18.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-1.13%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-9.20%

+6.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

3.52%

-2.75%

Volatility

AHMFX vs. AGTHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) is 1.10%, while American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that AHMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHMFXAGTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

3.84%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

11.66%

-9.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05%

15.16%

-12.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.86%

20.25%

-15.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.55%

19.69%

-15.14%

AHMFX vs. AGTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHMFX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than AGTHX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

AHMFX vs. AGTHX - Dividend Comparison

AHMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than AGTHX's 9.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGTHX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A
9.79%10.69%8.99%7.40%4.05%8.18%4.30%7.15%11.99%7.03%6.61%8.87%
AHMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2
4.12%5.58%4.04%2.97%2.71%3.44%3.60%3.68%3.88%4.19%3.74%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


AHMFX and AGTHX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGTHX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to AHMFX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHMFX dropped -17.65% vs AGTHX's -51.91%.

AHMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHMFX and AGTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer