AHLPX vs. LCSIX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

AHLPX (American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund) and LCSIX (LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund) are both Systematic Trend funds. Over the past 10 years, AHLPX returned 4.36%/yr vs 2.48%/yr for LCSIX. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AHLPX charges 1.83%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for LCSIX.

Performance

AHLPX vs. LCSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHLPX achieves a 9.66% return, which is significantly higher than LCSIX's 0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, AHLPX has outperformed LCSIX with an annualized return of 4.36%, while LCSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.48% annualized return.

AHLPX

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: -0.68%
• 6M: 2.61%
• YTD: 9.66%
• 1Y: 26.27%
• 3Y*: 4.40%
• 5Y*: 4.18%
• 10Y*: 4.36%
• ALL TIME*: 3.71%

LCSIX

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: -1.03%
• 6M: -2.38%
• YTD: 0.12%
• 1Y: -0.57%
• 3Y*: -2.59%
• 5Y*: 0.18%
• 10Y*: 2.48%
• ALL TIME*: 3.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AHLPX American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LCSIX LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

AHLPX vs. LCSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AHLPX American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund	9.66%	2.19%	1.74%	-4.20%	16.48%	4.67%	10.36%	0.09%	2.15%	4.79%
LCSIX LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund	0.12%	1.13%	-8.29%	-3.07%	6.04%	14.90%	9.90%	-5.97%	15.16%	6.19%

Correlation

The correlation between AHLPX and LCSIX is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.23

Return for Risk

AHLPX vs. LCSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AHLPX

AHLPX Risk / Return Rank: 94
AHLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
AHLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AHLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AHLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
AHLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

LCSIX

LCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3
LCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
LCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
LCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
LCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
LCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AHLPX vs. LCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AHLPX	LCSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	-0.13	+2.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	-0.14	+3.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	0.98	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.75	-0.16	+7.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.72	-0.34	+19.06

AHLPX vs. LCSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHLPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the LCSIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHLPX and LCSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AHLPX vs. LCSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHLPX drawdown since its inception was -21.90%, smaller than the maximum LCSIX drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHLPX and LCSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AHLPX	LCSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.90%	-25.13%	+3.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.50%	-4.97%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.90%	-11.60%	-10.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.90%	-13.21%	-8.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.90%	-13.21%	-8.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.94%	-11.11%	+8.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.70%	-6.41%	-0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.45%	2.34%	-0.89%

Volatility

AHLPX vs. LCSIX - Volatility Comparison

American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) at 2.07%. This indicates that AHLPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AHLPX	LCSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	2.07%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.85%	4.22%	+2.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.76%	6.08%	+4.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.68%	5.55%	+4.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.55%	6.67%	+2.88%

AHLPX vs. LCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHLPX has a 1.83% expense ratio, which is higher than LCSIX's 1.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AHLPX vs. LCSIX - Dividend Comparison

AHLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than LCSIX's 2.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AHLPX American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund	7.36%	8.07%	0.29%	0.63%	17.64%	7.15%	5.14%	4.17%	1.45%	4.07%	0.00%	3.40%
LCSIX LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund	2.32%	2.32%	2.75%	1.88%	10.75%	7.14%	2.94%	0.54%	12.36%	0.02%	3.21%	7.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AHLPX and LCSIX in my portfolio?

AHLPX and LCSIX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AHLPX or LCSIX?

AHLPX has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to LCSIX (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHLPX dropped -21.90% vs LCSIX's -25.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AHLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.