AHLPX vs. LCSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX).
AHLPX is managed by American Beacon. It was launched on Aug 18, 2014. LCSIX is managed by LoCorr Funds. It was launched on Dec 29, 2011.
Performance
AHLPX vs. LCSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AHLPX vs. LCSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHLPX American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 7.83% | 2.19% | 1.74% | -4.20% | 16.48% | 4.67% | 10.36% | 0.09% | 2.15% | 4.79% |
LCSIX LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund | 2.78% | 1.13% | -8.29% | -3.07% | 6.04% | 14.90% | 9.90% | -5.97% | 15.16% | 6.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AHLPX achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly higher than LCSIX's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, AHLPX has outperformed LCSIX with an annualized return of 3.94%, while LCSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.75% annualized return.
AHLPX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- 7.83%
- 6M
- 14.73%
- 1Y
- 16.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- 4.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
LCSIX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 0.27%
- 3Y*
- -2.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.03%
- 10Y*
- 2.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AHLPX vs. LCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AHLPX has a 1.83% expense ratio, which is higher than LCSIX's 1.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AHLPX vs. LCSIX — Risk / Return Rank
AHLPX
LCSIX
AHLPX vs. LCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AHLPX | LCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 0.15 | +1.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 0.25 | +1.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.03 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 0.24 | +1.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.98 | 0.49 | +3.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AHLPX | LCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 0.15 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.37 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.41 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.46 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between AHLPX and LCSIX is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AHLPX vs. LCSIX - Dividend Comparison
AHLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than LCSIX's 2.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHLPX American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 7.49% | 8.07% | 0.29% | 0.63% | 17.64% | 7.15% | 5.14% | 4.17% | 1.45% | 4.07% | 0.00% | 3.40% |
LCSIX LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund | 2.26% | 2.32% | 2.75% | 1.88% | 10.75% | 7.14% | 2.94% | 0.54% | 12.36% | 0.02% | 3.21% | 7.36% |
Drawdowns
AHLPX vs. LCSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHLPX drawdown since its inception was -21.90%, smaller than the maximum LCSIX drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHLPX and LCSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AHLPX | LCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.90% | -25.13% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -4.31% | -4.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.90% | -13.21% | -8.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.90% | -13.71% | -8.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -8.74% | +6.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -6.33% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 2.15% | +1.83% |
Volatility
AHLPX vs. LCSIX - Volatility Comparison
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) at 1.44%. This indicates that AHLPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AHLPX | LCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 1.44% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.67% | 5.31% | +3.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.29% | 6.96% | +4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.68% | 5.58% | +4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.47% | 6.71% | +2.76% |