PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHLIX vs. PQTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHLIX vs. PQTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHLIX achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly higher than PQTAX's 2.33% return. Over the past 10 years, AHLIX has outperformed PQTAX with an annualized return of 4.76%, while PQTAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.54% annualized return.


AHLIX

1D
-0.66%
1M
-0.19%
6M
4.37%
YTD
10.28%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*
4.76%
ALL TIME*
4.14%

PQTAX

1D
-0.85%
1M
-1.96%
6M
-0.81%
YTD
2.33%
1Y
15.52%
3Y*
-0.02%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
3.54%
ALL TIME*
3.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AHLIX vs. PQTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AHLIX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5
10.28%2.59%2.07%-3.85%16.94%5.09%10.71%0.44%2.52%5.23%
PQTAX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A
2.33%2.06%-3.31%-4.52%11.06%14.52%8.48%2.63%1.98%4.51%

Correlation

The correlation between AHLIX and PQTAX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.79

The correlation between AHLIX and PQTAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHLIX vs. PQTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AHLIX
AHLIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AHLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AHLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PQTAX
PQTAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PQTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PQTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AHLIX vs. PQTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AHLIXPQTAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.28

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.05

2.93

+4.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.42

7.22

+10.20

AHLIX vs. PQTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the PQTAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHLIX and PQTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AHLIX vs. PQTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHLIX drawdown since its inception was -21.62%, smaller than the maximum PQTAX drawdown of -28.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHLIX and PQTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHLIXPQTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.62%

-28.39%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-4.66%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-18.94%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

-28.39%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.62%

-28.39%

+6.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.69%

-15.45%

+12.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.49%

-9.42%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

1.90%

-0.46%

Volatility

AHLIX vs. PQTAX - Volatility Comparison

American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX) at 2.08%. This indicates that AHLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHLIXPQTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

2.08%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.21%

6.67%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.91%

8.69%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.65%

9.94%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.51%

9.34%

+0.17%

AHLIX vs. PQTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHLIX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is lower than PQTAX's 1.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

AHLIX vs. PQTAX - Dividend Comparison

AHLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than PQTAX's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHLIX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5
7.48%8.25%0.55%1.10%17.63%7.44%5.33%4.47%1.83%4.01%0.00%3.51%
PQTAX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A
1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.61%2.22%4.46%2.29%0.10%2.54%0.00%7.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


AHLIX and PQTAX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AHLIX has higher volatility (2.45%) compared to PQTAX (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHLIX dropped -21.62% vs PQTAX's -28.39%.

AHLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHLIX and PQTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer